Skip to main content

Panasonic vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Panasonic
Japan Founded 1918
Read the Panasonic review
VS
Trina Solar
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Trina Solar review
At a glance

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 25 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
25 340
Highest power
430 Wp 760 Wp
Best efficiency
22.2% 24.8%
Average efficiency
20.7% 21.7%
Bifacial share
16% 43%
Average warranty
25 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Panasonic

Panasonic is a global leader in the development of innovative technologies and solutions for wide-ranging applications in the consumer electronics, housing, automotive, industry, communications, and energy sectors. The company was founded in 1918 by Konosuke Matsushita and has been committed to enhancing the quality...

Founded
1918
Headquarters
Kadoma, near Ōsaka, Japan
Annual capacity
1+ GW/year
Employees
9,500+
Trina Solar
Founded
1997
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Panasonic Trina Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 25 340+315
Max Power 430 W 760 W+330 W
Avg Power 367 W 520 W+153 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 22.20% 24.80%+2.60 pp
Avg Efficiency 20.68% 21.71%+1.03 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.267%/°C+0.034 -0.302%/°C
Bifacial Share 4 (16%) 145 (43%)+27 pp
Avg Warranty 25.0 yrs 28.2 yrs+3.2 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)

Panasonic cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (88%)

Trina Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Panasonic is a Japanese electronics conglomerate headquartered in Osaka, with a solar manufacturing history dating back to 1975. For decades the company was regarded as a technology leader, particularly in heterojunction HJT cell development, and its EverVolt product line once ranked among the most widely specified residential panels in North America. That trajectory reversed in stages: the manufacturing partnership with Tesla ended in 2020, in-house panel production ceased in 2022, and the EverVolt line was subsequently produced under contract by REC Group. In April 2025, Panasonic announced the full discontinuation of its solar and battery storage business lines, ending its presence in the industry entirely. The brand no longer functions as an active manufacturer for new installations. Trina Solar, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province. The company achieved a 100% bankability rating from BloombergNEF for the eighth time in 2025, and has been named a Kiwa PVEL Top Performer for eleven consecutive years. In 2024, Trina Solar shipped approximately 77 GW of modules, placing it among the top three producers globally, with cumulative worldwide deliveries exceeding 205 GW. In institutional standing and active market presence, Trina Solar has no peer in this comparison.

Trina Solar's product portfolio covers all major deployment contexts. The Vertex S+ series, built on N-type TOPCon technology, is targeted at residential rooftops and reaches efficiencies of around 22.3%, with an all-black variant available for design-conscious installations. Commercial and industrial projects are served by larger-format Vertex modules approaching approximately 23% efficiency, while utility-scale developers can access bifacial dual-glass panels in the high-power Vertex range, with the manufacturer reporting efficiencies above 24% on its largest formats. Flagship products carry a 30-year power output warranty, and residential modules are backed by a 25-year product warranty - both above typical industry baselines.

For any buyer evaluating these two manufacturers today, the conclusion is unambiguous. Panasonic has exited the solar market and cannot be selected for new projects. Trina Solar is a bankable, high-volume active producer with a well-documented reliability record and a portfolio suited to residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications alike. Between the two, Trina Solar is the only viable option.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-07

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Panasonic A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Trina Solar
Manufacturers
Panasonic AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Trina Solar
Manufacturers
Panasonic AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Trina Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 3 Panasonic offers · See 249 Trina Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.