Panasonic vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 25 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Panasonic is a global leader in the development of innovative technologies and solutions for wide-ranging applications in the consumer electronics, housing, automotive, industry, communications, and energy sectors. The company was founded in 1918 by Konosuke Matsushita and has been committed to enhancing the quality...
- Founded
- 1918
- Headquarters
- Kadoma, near Ōsaka, Japan
- Annual capacity
- 1+ GW/year
- Employees
- 9,500+
- Founded
- 1997
- Headquarters
- Changzhou, China
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+
Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (88%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)
The flagships
Written summary
Panasonic is a Japanese electronics conglomerate headquartered in Osaka, with a solar manufacturing history dating back to 1975. For decades the company was regarded as a technology leader, particularly in heterojunction HJT cell development, and its EverVolt product line once ranked among the most widely specified residential panels in North America. That trajectory reversed in stages: the manufacturing partnership with Tesla ended in 2020, in-house panel production ceased in 2022, and the EverVolt line was subsequently produced under contract by REC Group. In April 2025, Panasonic announced the full discontinuation of its solar and battery storage business lines, ending its presence in the industry entirely. The brand no longer functions as an active manufacturer for new installations. Trina Solar, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province. The company achieved a 100% bankability rating from BloombergNEF for the eighth time in 2025, and has been named a Kiwa PVEL Top Performer for eleven consecutive years. In 2024, Trina Solar shipped approximately 77 GW of modules, placing it among the top three producers globally, with cumulative worldwide deliveries exceeding 205 GW. In institutional standing and active market presence, Trina Solar has no peer in this comparison.
Trina Solar's product portfolio covers all major deployment contexts. The Vertex S+ series, built on N-type TOPCon technology, is targeted at residential rooftops and reaches efficiencies of around 22.3%, with an all-black variant available for design-conscious installations. Commercial and industrial projects are served by larger-format Vertex modules approaching approximately 23% efficiency, while utility-scale developers can access bifacial dual-glass panels in the high-power Vertex range, with the manufacturer reporting efficiencies above 24% on its largest formats. Flagship products carry a 30-year power output warranty, and residential modules are backed by a 25-year product warranty - both above typical industry baselines.
For any buyer evaluating these two manufacturers today, the conclusion is unambiguous. Panasonic has exited the solar market and cannot be selected for new projects. Trina Solar is a bankable, high-volume active producer with a well-documented reliability record and a portfolio suited to residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications alike. Between the two, Trina Solar is the only viable option.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-07
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 3 Panasonic offers · See 249 Trina Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.