Skip to main content
Deep dive 3 of 7

How panels behave in the heat

A module is rated at a 25 °C cell temperature and almost never runs there. On a roof in summer the cell sits 20 to 50 °C above the air, and the temperature coefficient of Pmax says what that costs: the percentage of rated power lost per degree above 25.

It is the specification that separates two modules with the same efficiency on paper. Across 14,047 panels declaring one, the coefficient runs from -0.500 to -0.223 - a spread worth 11.1 percentage points of output on a hot afternoon, which is more than most price differences are worth.

Best coefficient
-0.223
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD
Median coefficient
-0.300
half the market is worse
Worst tracked
-0.500
loses the most per degree
Output kept at 65 °C
91.1%
best in the set
Same, median panel
88.0%
at a 40 °C rise over STC
Median NOCT
45.0 °C
cell temp at 800 W/m², 20 °C air
01

What the distribution shows

Most modules cluster just under the median

8,068 panels hold -0.30 %/°C or better - the band worth having in a hot climate - and 1,693 are worse than -0.35, where a 40 °C rise costs more than 14% of rated output.

-0.30
-0.30 or bettermiddleworse than -0.35
Architecture decides most of it

Heterojunction cells lead by construction: their lower operating voltage drift is exactly the property this coefficient measures. The axis starts at zero, so the gap reads as the fraction of a percent per degree that it is.

Average of every panel declaring that architecture.
NOCT says how hot the module gets in the first place

The coefficient is only half the story: NOCT is the cell temperature at 800 W/m² and 20 °C air, so a module with a low NOCT spends less time in the range where its coefficient hurts. The median is 45.0 °C across 13,011 panels declaring it, and the spread runs 39 to 70.

43 °C and below46 °C and above
02

Best in the heat

What the difference is worth

At a cell temperature of 65 °C - an ordinary summer afternoon on a dark roof - the best module in the set keeps 91.1% of its rated power and the worst keeps 80.0%. On a 10 kWp array that is the difference between 9108 W and 8000 W of instantaneous output.

The coefficient is a rating, not a promise: it is measured at the cell, and how hot the cell actually gets depends on mounting, clearance and wind as much as on the module. Read it against NOCT rather than on its own.

Best in set -0.223 %/°C Median -0.300 %/°C
Compare two panels
03

By manufacturer

Read this ranking carefully

A brand that sells only heterojunction modules will lead this table on physics rather than on engineering, and a brand with a full range will sit mid-table while its best module beats everything above it.

Catalogues under 20 panels are marked in amber for the same reason: one product line moves a small average a long way.

Manufacturer insights
04

How these numbers are built

Read from datasheets

Every figure comes from a manufacturer datasheet ingested into the panel database. Nothing is modelled, estimated, or supplied by a brand outside its own published specification.

Recomputed daily

Aggregates recompute as new panels arrive. A panel that does not declare a value is left out of that average rather than filled in, so every figure here is backed by modules that actually publish it.

Unweighted and unpaid

No paid placements, and no figure here reads which shops pay us a commission. Each power rating counts as the module it is. Bifacial datasheets that quote one module at several assumed rear-side gains are counted once, on their front-side rating.