Skip to main content
Recomputed after every nightly sync

The state of solar panels, by the numbers

Every figure on this page is computed from the 14,133 panels in the database, read from manufacturer datasheets rather than press releases. Nothing is modelled, estimated or weighted by brand - a module from a 654-panel catalogue counts exactly as much as one from a catalogue of four.

Where a manufacturer has not published a figure, that panel is left out of the average rather than filled in: 14,126 of the 14,133 panels declare an efficiency, 14,047 a temperature coefficient, 11,670 an annual degradation rate. The deep dives below carry the full distributions.

Panels tracked
14,133
read from datasheets
Manufacturers
190
with at least one panel
Median power
495 Wp
range 4 to 805
Median efficiency
21.82%
front-side conversion
Median density
218 Wp/m²
best 252 Wp/m²
Median warranty
15 yrs
product, not performance
01

What the data says right now

Four shifts visible across the whole catalogue. Each one links to the deep dive that carries its full distribution.

TOPCon has taken the market

44.3% of the 12,998 panels that declare a cell technology now ship TOPCon cells. PERC, the default of the last decade, is being retired catalogue by catalogue, and back-contact still reads as a premium niche rather than a successor.

44%
Share of the 12,998 panels declaring a technology.
The efficiency race has a long tail

Half the market sits within a point of 21.82%. Above 23% the field thins to 2,286 panels, and the record holder at 25.20% is far enough ahead that it says more about one product line than about where the market is.

21.82%
23% and abovebelow 23% Mean 21.49%
Bifacial crossed the halfway mark

More than half of tracked modules are now dual-sided. Worth reading carefully: the median rear face produces 80% of what the front does under equal light, and it only sees that light on a bright surface with clearance behind the array.

55.3%
Bifacial · 7,813 panelsMonofacial · 6,320
Median bifaciality 80% Panels declaring it 6,024
Bifacial deep dive
Heat is where panels quietly differ

A roof runs 20 to 50 °C above the air, and the spread between the best and worst temperature coefficient is worth more over a summer than most price differences. 8,068 panels hold a coefficient of -0.30 %/°C or better.

-0.22
-0.223 best-0.300 median-0.500 worst
Output kept at 65 °C, best 91.1% Same, worst in set 80.0%
Temperature deep dive
02

Who is in the catalogue

All 190 manufacturers
Largest catalogues panels tracked
The top 8 brands account for 24% of everything tracked. The remaining 182 manufacturers hold the rest.
Catalogue size is not quality

The largest catalogue and the highest-efficiency panel belong to different companies, and neither leads on temperature behaviour. Breadth and peak performance are separate achievements, and a market average made of many cheap variants is not a verdict on a brand.

Largest catalogue AE Solar 654 panels Highest front-side efficiency AIKO 25.20% Best in heat AUSTA ENERGY -0.223 %/°C
Manufacturer insights
03

Deep dives

Each carries the full distribution, the per-manufacturer breakdown and the panels behind every figure.

04

How these numbers are built

Read from datasheets

Every figure comes from a manufacturer datasheet ingested into the panel database. Nothing is modelled, estimated, or supplied by a brand outside its own published specification.

Recomputed daily

Aggregates recompute as new panels arrive. A panel that does not declare a value is left out of that average rather than filled in, so every figure here is backed by modules that actually publish it.

Unweighted and unpaid

No paid placements, and no figure here reads which shops pay us a commission. Each power rating counts as the module it is. Bifacial datasheets that quote one module at several assumed rear-side gains are counted once, on their front-side rating.