Skip to main content
Deep dive 1 of 7

Module efficiency, broken down

Efficiency is the share of sunlight landing on a module that leaves it as electricity, measured at standard test conditions - 1000 W/m², 25 °C cell temperature, AM1.5 spectrum.

It is a measure per square metre, not per panel. A more efficient module produces more from the same roof area; it does not automatically produce more than a physically larger panel, and it says nothing about how either behaves once the roof is hot. For that, read the temperature deep dive.

Median efficiency
21.82%
half the market is below
Mean efficiency
21.49%
pulled down by the long left tail
Panels at 23% or more
2,286
16.2% of those declaring
Highest front-side
25.20%
AIKO AIKO-A680-MDE72Mw
Top decile starts at
23.20%
one panel in ten is above
Lowest tracked
10.50%
the bottom of the range
01

What the distribution shows

The market clusters, then thins fast

71.4% of everything tracked sits between 20 and 23%. Above that line the field drops to 2,286 panels, and the tail beyond 25% is thin enough that a record there describes one product line rather than a market.

23% and abovebelow 23% Median 21.82% · mean 21.49%
Cell architecture sets the ceiling

Back Contact leads at 23.5% and CdTe trails at 18.5%, a spread of 5.0 points. The axis starts at zero on purpose - the gap between the best and worst architecture is real, but it is not the chasm a truncated axis makes it look. Every panel declaring an architecture is in here, 13,034 of them.

Average of every panel declaring that architecture.
Bigger panels are not more efficient panels

Power and efficiency rise together only because both track cell technology. Across the catalogue the correlation is weak: 180 Wp modules reach 23.0%, and there are 650 Wp modules below 21%. A panel's wattage tells you how much roof it needs, not how good it is.

A random sample of 240 panels declaring both figures, out of 14,133.
02

The most efficient panels

Two lists, because two numbers are being reported. Bifacial datasheets often quote an efficiency that already includes an assumed rear-side gain, and one product can appear four times at four different assumptions. Those figures are not comparable with a front-side rating, so they are listed separately rather than mixed into one ranking - and they are excluded from every average on this page.
Highest with a declared rear-side gain
Rear-side gain depends on the surface under the array and the clearance behind it. Treat these as a ceiling, not a rating.
03

By manufacturer

Read this ranking carefully

A catalogue average rewards a narrow, premium range and punishes breadth. AIKO leads on 144 panels; AE Solar's 654-panel catalogue spans everything from budget to flagship, so its average sits lower while its best module beats most of the names above it.

Manufacturers with fewer than 20 panels are marked in amber - one strong product line moves their average further than any amount of engineering moves a large one.

Highest catalogue average AIKO 23.7% · 144 Largest catalogue AE Solar 21.1% · 654
Manufacturer insights
04

How these numbers are built

Read from datasheets

Every figure comes from a manufacturer datasheet ingested into the panel database. Nothing is modelled, estimated, or supplied by a brand outside its own published specification.

Recomputed daily

Aggregates recompute as new panels arrive. A panel that does not declare a value is left out of that average rather than filled in, so every figure here is backed by modules that actually publish it.

Unweighted and unpaid

No paid placements, and no figure here reads which shops pay us a commission. Each power rating counts as the module it is. Bifacial datasheets that quote one module at several assumed rear-side gains are counted once, on their front-side rating.