Skip to main content

AIKO vs Hyundai - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AIKO
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the AIKO review
VS
Hyundai
South Korea Founded 2004 Tier 1
Read the Hyundai review
At a glance

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 65 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
144 65
Highest power
805 Wp 640 Wp
Best efficiency
25.2% 23.4%
Average efficiency
23.7% 21.5%
Bifacial share
24% 66%
Average warranty
30 yrs 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
AIKO
Founded
2009
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Hyundai

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...

Founded
2004
Headquarters
Seongnam-si, South Korea
Annual capacity
1.35 GW/year
Employees
206
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric AIKO Hyundai
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 144+79 65
Max Power 805 W+165 W 640 W
Avg Power 581 W+139 W 442 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 25.20%+1.80 pp 23.40%
Avg Efficiency 23.65%+2.16 pp 21.49%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.271%/°C+0.030 -0.300%/°C
Bifacial Share 35 (24%) 43 (66%)+42 pp
Avg Warranty 29.5 yrs+2.1 yr 27.4 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)

AIKO cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)

Hyundai cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (38%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

AIKO, founded in 2009 and headquartered in Shenzhen, China, is a focused solar manufacturer listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange that achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankable status by Q3 2024. Hyundai Energy Solutions, operating since 2004 under the Fortune Global 500 HD Hyundai Group, is listed on the Korea Stock Exchange and runs a 1.35 GW annual manufacturing capacity in South Korea. Both hold Tier 1 status, but Hyundai carries deeper institutional credibility through its longer operating history, larger production footprint, and the financial backing of one of the world's largest industrial conglomerates - factors that matter in lender due diligence and large-contract procurement.

The portfolio differences are substantial. AIKO's 144-model catalog is built around its proprietary All Back Contact cell architecture, which accounts for 73.6% of its lineup and pushes average module efficiency to 23.7% with an average rated output of 581 Wp; its top product reaches 805 Wp at 25.2% efficiency. Its temperature coefficient averages -0.27% per degree Celsius and warranties average 29.5 years, both favorable figures for hot-climate rooftop applications. Only 24.3% of AIKO's panels are bifacial, signaling a lineup aimed squarely at premium residential and commercial rooftop buyers where space is limited and per-panel yield counts most. Hyundai's 65-model range averages 21.5% efficiency and 442 Wp, topping out at 640 Wp and 23.4%, with a slightly weaker temperature coefficient of -0.30% per degree Celsius and 27.4-year average warranties. However, 66.2% of Hyundai's catalog is bifacial, and its leading cell technology is HJT, represented across 38.5% of models - a combination that fits utility-scale and ground-mount projects well, where bifacial albedo gain can close the efficiency gap.

For most buyers in 2025, the choice maps to application. AIKO is the stronger pick for space-constrained rooftop projects where maximum watts per square meter is decisive; its Back Contact technology and warranty depth are genuine differentiators. Hyundai suits large ground-mount or commercial installations where bifacial output, an established supply chain, and the assurance of a multi-decade corporate parent take priority. On raw quality and bankability, neither is the wrong answer.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
AIKO A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Hyundai
Manufacturers
AIKO AEET
Manufacturers
AKCOME Hyundai
Manufacturers
AIKO ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM Hyundai
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 179 AIKO offers · See 42 Hyundai offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.