AIKO vs AEET - Solar Panel Manufacturer Comparison
AIKO
China · est. 2009AEET
HQ unknown
Panel models
144
vs
5
Max power
805 W
vs
200 W
Max efficiency
25.20%
vs
15.70%
Bifacial share
24%
vs
0%
At a glance
AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 5 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).
AIKO
Website
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Founded
2009
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
Yes
Stock
AEET
Headquarters
-
Founded
-
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
No
Stock
-
Side-by-Side Specs
winner + margin shown| Metric |
AIKO
|
AEET
|
|---|---|---|
| Catalog & Power | ||
| Panel Models | 144 +139 | 5 |
| Max Power | 805 W +605 W | 200 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W +391 W | 190 W |
| Efficiency | ||
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% +9.50 pp | 15.70% |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% +8.75 pp | 14.90% |
| Reliability & Warranty | ||
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | - |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) +24 pp | 0 (0%) |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs +4.5 yr | 25.0 yrs |
Top Panels Side-by-Side
Top 10 highest-power models from each brandAIKO
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw Bi | 805W | 25.1% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw Bi | 800W | 24.9% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw Bi | 795W | 24.8% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw Bi | 790W | 24.6% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw Bi | 785W | 24.4% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw Bi | 780W | 24.3% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw Bi | 775W | 24.1% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw Bi | 770W | 24.0% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw | 700W | 25.0% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw | 695W | 24.9% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
AEET
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SE200M(24)F | 200W | 15.7% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | SE195M(24)F | 195W | 15.3% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | SE190M(24)F | 190W | 14.9% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | SE185M(24)F | 185W | 14.5% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | SE180M(24)F | 180W | 14.1% | - | Monocrystalline |
Top 10 panels average
Efficiency
24.61%
Temp coeff
-0.260%/°C
Top 5 panels average
Efficiency
14.90%
Temp coeff
-
Efficiency Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by efficiency tier
AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+
Power Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by rated power range
AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)
AIKO Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: Back Contact (74%)
AEET Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on our database and may not reflect complete product lineups. Help the community by suggesting missing panels.