AIKO vs A.B. Energy - Solar Panel Manufacturer Comparison
AIKO
China · est. 2009A.B. Energy
Germany · est. 1996
Panel models
144
vs
0
Max power
805 W
vs
0 W
Max efficiency
25.20%
vs
-
Bifacial share
24%
vs
0%
At a glance
AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 0 models). AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).
AIKO
Website
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Founded
2009
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
Yes
Stock
A.B. Energy
Website
ABO Energy is a renewable energy company that develops and constructs renewable energy projects, focusing on wind, solar, and storage facilities. They offer turnkey solutions and have connected several gigawatts of nominal output to the grid. The company is active internationally and is committed to driving the energy...
Headquarters
Wiesbaden, Germany
Founded
1996
Employees
1,400
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
-
Side-by-Side Specs
winner + margin shown| Metric |
AIKO
|
A.B. Energy
|
|---|---|---|
| Catalog & Power | ||
| Panel Models | 144 +144 | 0 |
| Max Power | 805 W +805 W | 0 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W +581 W | 0 W |
| Efficiency | ||
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% | - |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | - |
| Reliability & Warranty | ||
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | - |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) +24 pp | 0 (0%) |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | - |
Top Panels Side-by-Side
Top 10 highest-power models from each brandAIKO
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw Bi | 805W | 25.1% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw Bi | 800W | 24.9% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw Bi | 795W | 24.8% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw Bi | 790W | 24.6% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw Bi | 785W | 24.4% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw Bi | 780W | 24.3% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw Bi | 775W | 24.1% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw Bi | 770W | 24.0% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw | 700W | 25.0% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw | 695W | 24.9% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
A.B. Energy
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No panel data available. | |||||
Top 10 panels average
Efficiency
24.61%
Temp coeff
-0.260%/°C
Top 0 panels average
Efficiency
-
Temp coeff
-
Efficiency Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by efficiency tier
AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+
Power Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by rated power range
AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)
AIKO Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: Back Contact (74%)
A.B. Energy Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on our database and may not reflect complete product lineups. Help the community by suggesting missing panels.