AKCOME vs Hyundai - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 3 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...
- Founded
- 2004
- Headquarters
- Seongnam-si, South Korea
- Annual capacity
- 1.35 GW/year
- Employees
- 206
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (38%)
The flagships
Written summary
Hyundai Energy Solutions is the solar division of HD Hyundai, a South Korean conglomerate whose origins trace back to Hyundai Heavy Industries, founded in 1972. The solar arm has been active for over two decades and holds Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankability status, meaning major financial institutions are willing to finance projects using its panels. Its annual manufacturing capacity stands at approximately 1.4 GW, a relatively modest figure by Chinese-industry standards but supported by the reputational weight of one of South Korea's largest industrial groups. AKCOME, formally Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology, is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu, founded in 2006 and publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange since 2011. It operates a large-scale 6 GW panel factory in Huzhou, Zhejiang, and was previously recognized as a Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 manufacturer, though it was removed from that list in 2024. On institutional footprint and bankability, Hyundai currently holds the clearer advantage.
In terms of product focus, Hyundai targets residential and small commercial buyers with two main lines - the XG Series for standard rooftop installations and the YH bifacial Series suited to ground-mounted systems. The company has recently moved into mass production of N-type TOPCon cells. AKCOME has carved out a niche as a specialist in heterojunction (HJT) technology, having researched the segment since 2012 and reporting mass-production cell efficiencies of up to 25.7%. Its current catalog centers on higher-wattage modules in the 655 W to 700 W range, positioning the brand more firmly toward commercial and utility-scale ground-mount projects. AKCOME is also investing in perovskite R&D and has piloted copper-paste processes to reduce silver consumption in HJT cells - moves that signal a technology-forward but higher-risk strategic posture.
For a typical buyer in 2025 - especially one financing a residential or small commercial system in a Western market - Hyundai is the more straightforward choice, offering Tier 1 bankability, a well-known brand, and a mid-range price point. AKCOME is worth considering for buyers specifically seeking HJT technology at utility scale, or for markets where its distribution network is strong, but the loss of Tier 1 status introduces a layer of due diligence that risk-averse project financiers may be unwilling to accept.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-22
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers · See 42 Hyundai offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.