AKCOME vs AEET - Solar Panel Manufacturer Comparison
AKCOME
China · est. 2003AEET
HQ unknown
Panel models
3
vs
5
Max power
700 W
vs
200 W
Max efficiency
22.54%
vs
15.70%
Bifacial share
100%
vs
0%
At a glance
AEET has the broader catalog (5 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
AKCOME
Website
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
Founded
2003
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
No
Stock
-
AEET
Headquarters
-
Founded
-
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
No
Stock
-
Side-by-Side Specs
winner + margin shown| Metric |
AKCOME
|
AEET
|
|---|---|---|
| Catalog & Power | ||
| Panel Models | 3 | 5 +2 |
| Max Power | 700 W +500 W | 200 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W +482 W | 190 W |
| Efficiency | ||
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% +6.84 pp | 15.70% |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% +6.73 pp | 14.90% |
| Reliability & Warranty | ||
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | - |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) +100 pp | 0 (0%) |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs +5.0 yr | 25.0 yrs |
Top Panels Side-by-Side
Top 10 highest-power models from each brandAKCOME
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SKA611HDGDC-700W Bi | 700W | 22.5% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | SKA611HDGDC-660W Bi | 660W | 21.2% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | SKA611HDGDC-655W Bi | 655W | 21.1% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
AEET
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SE200M(24)F | 200W | 15.7% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | SE195M(24)F | 195W | 15.3% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | SE190M(24)F | 190W | 14.9% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | SE185M(24)F | 185W | 14.5% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | SE180M(24)F | 180W | 14.1% | - | Monocrystalline |
Top 3 panels average
Efficiency
21.63%
Temp coeff
-0.240%/°C
Top 5 panels average
Efficiency
14.90%
Temp coeff
-
Efficiency Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by efficiency tier
Power Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by rated power range
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
AKCOME Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: HJT (100%)
AEET Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on our database and may not reflect complete product lineups. Help the community by suggesting missing panels.