AKCOME vs AIKO - Solar Panel Manufacturer Comparison
AKCOME
China · est. 2003AIKO
China · est. 2009
Panel models
3
vs
144
Max power
700 W
vs
805 W
Max efficiency
22.54%
vs
25.20%
Bifacial share
100%
vs
24%
At a glance
AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 3 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
AKCOME
Website
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
Founded
2003
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
No
Stock
-
AIKO
Website
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Founded
2009
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
Yes
Stock
Side-by-Side Specs
winner + margin shown| Metric |
AKCOME
|
AIKO
|
|---|---|---|
| Catalog & Power | ||
| Panel Models | 3 | 144 +141 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 805 W +105 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W +90 W | 581 W |
| Efficiency | ||
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 25.20% +2.66 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 23.65% +2.02 pp |
| Reliability & Warranty | ||
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C +0.031 | -0.271%/°C |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) +76 pp | 35 (24%) |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs +0.5 yr | 29.5 yrs |
Top Panels Side-by-Side
Top 10 highest-power models from each brandAKCOME
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SKA611HDGDC-700W Bi | 700W | 22.5% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | SKA611HDGDC-660W Bi | 660W | 21.2% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | SKA611HDGDC-655W Bi | 655W | 21.1% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
AIKO
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw Bi | 805W | 25.1% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw Bi | 800W | 24.9% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw Bi | 795W | 24.8% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw Bi | 790W | 24.6% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw Bi | 785W | 24.4% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw Bi | 780W | 24.3% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw Bi | 775W | 24.1% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw Bi | 770W | 24.0% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw | 700W | 25.0% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw | 695W | 24.9% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
Top 3 panels average
Efficiency
21.63%
Temp coeff
-0.240%/°C
Top 10 panels average
Efficiency
24.61%
Temp coeff
-0.260%/°C
Efficiency Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by efficiency tier
AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+
Power Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by rated power range
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
AKCOME Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: HJT (100%)
AIKO Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: Back Contact (74%)
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on our database and may not reflect complete product lineups. Help the community by suggesting missing panels.