Huayao vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 126 models). Huayao leans bifacial (74% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
- Founded
- 1997
- Headquarters
- Changzhou, China
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Huayao skews to higher efficiency: 26% of lineup is 23%+
Huayao offers more 600W+ panels (51% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (44%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)
The flagships
Written summary
Huayao Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd. is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2019 and headquartered in Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, with a dedicated cell and module production subsidiary in Changzhou established in 2021. The company scaled aggressively, reaching a reported annual capacity of approximately 20 GW spanning wafers, cells, and modules, and is listed among Tier 1 manufacturers by ENF Solar for Q1 2025. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and also based in Changzhou, Jiangsu, ranks among the most established photovoltaic producers in the world, having recorded cumulative global shipments exceeding 205 GW and targeting module manufacturing capacity above 120 GW by end-2025. Trina Solar holds consecutive BloombergNEF Tier 1 recognition, including Q1 2025, and with nearly three decades of operating history and deep ties to international project finance, its institutional footprint is substantially stronger than Huayao's.
Huayao's catalog spans monocrystalline PERC-based modules alongside n-type panels, including bifacial glass-on-glass formats reaching up to 730 Wp. The company has secured meaningful utility-scale procurement with major Chinese state energy groups, suggesting its commercial focus lies primarily with ground-mount farms and large commercial rooftops rather than distributed residential markets. Trina Solar structures its offering around the Vertex product families - the Vertex N line, anchored by the latest i-TOPCon Ultra modules at up to 760 W and 24.5% efficiency, targets utility-scale ground-mount projects, while the Vertex S+ G3 serves residential and C&I rooftop buyers in the 465 W to 495 W range. Both families rely on TOPCon cell technology, and Trina's large-scale TOPCon 2.0 rollout positions it among the frontrunners in next-generation module efficiency.
For most international buyers, Trina Solar is the lower-risk default choice - its warranty infrastructure, global distributor network, and long project-finance track record are considerably more mature than Huayao's. Huayao is nonetheless a credible option for large utility procurement where price competitiveness and confirmed 20 GW manufacturing capacity outweigh the value of brand depth. For residential or smaller C&I applications where long-term local service support matters most, Trina Solar's multi-decade advantage over a manufacturer with fewer than six years of history remains meaningful.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-14
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 219 Trina Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.