Skip to main content

DAH Solar vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

DAH Solar
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the DAH Solar review
VS
Trina Solar
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Trina Solar review
At a glance

DAH Solar has the broader catalog (363 vs 340 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. DAH Solar leans bifacial (87% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
363 340
Highest power
725 Wp 760 Wp
Best efficiency
23.3% 24.8%
Average efficiency
22.1% 21.7%
Bifacial share
87% 43%
Average warranty
29 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
DAH Solar

DAH Solar is an innovation-driven and technology-leading company specializing in PV product manufacturing. They focus on R&D, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency PV modules, integrated PV systems, and solar energy storage systems. DAH Solar is known for its patented Full-Screen PV Module and SolarUnit...

Founded
2009
Headquarters
Hefei, China
Annual capacity
10 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Trina Solar
Founded
1997
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric DAH Solar Trina Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 363+23 340
Max Power 725 W 760 W+35 W
Avg Power 520 W+0 W 520 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.34% 24.80%+1.46 pp
Avg Efficiency 22.10%+0.39 pp 21.71%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.299%/°C+0.003 -0.302%/°C
Bifacial Share 316 (87%)+44 pp 145 (43%)
Avg Warranty 29.4 yrs+1.1 yr 28.2 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)

DAH Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (88%)

Trina Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Trina Solar, founded in 1997, is one of the most established solar module manufacturers in the world, with an estimated 77 GW of shipments in 2024 and a confirmed top-5 market position in Europe. The company has been a consistent presence on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 bankable list and is actively targeting high-value markets including Europe, the United States, Australia, and the Middle East. DAH Solar, founded in 2009 in Hefei, China, is a considerably younger but fast-growing manufacturer with a declared production capacity of 10 GW and a steady Tier 1 ranking as of Q1 2025. Both companies are Chinese-headquartered, Tier 1 bankable suppliers, but Trina Solar holds a substantially larger global footprint and a longer international track record - factors that weigh heavily in project finance and insurance underwriting.

On the technology side, both manufacturers have made TOPCon their primary cell platform - DAH Solar across approximately 79.6% of its 363-panel portfolio, Trina Solar across approximately 69.8% of its 305-panel lineup. DAH Solar's most distinctive differentiator is its bifacial penetration rate of 87%, compared to just 39% for Trina Solar, making DAH Solar a compelling option for utility-scale ground-mount projects, agrivoltaic installations, and commercial flat-roof systems where rear-side irradiance gain matters. DAH Solar also leads on average module power (520 Wp vs. 506 Wp), average efficiency (22.1% vs. 21.5%), average temperature coefficient (-0.299%/°C vs. -0.304%/°C), and average warranty length (29.4 years vs. 28.1 years). Trina Solar counters with a higher peak efficiency ceiling - its best modules reach 24.1% vs. DAH Solar's 23.34% - and a maximum power output of 740 Wp, giving it an edge for high-density residential rooftop installs and large C&I projects where efficiency per square meter is critical.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision hinges largely on project type and risk tolerance. Trina Solar is the lower-risk selection for large utility-scale or C&I projects where bankability, European supply chain depth, and long-term service support are decisive. DAH Solar suits buyers who prioritize a high bifacial ratio, marginally better thermal performance, and longer warranty coverage - particularly for ground-mount, agrivoltaic, or mid-scale commercial applications where the bifacial premium drives returns.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
DAH Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Trina Solar
Manufacturers
DAH Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Trina Solar
Manufacturers
DAH Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Trina Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 11 DAH Solar offers · See 248 Trina Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.