AKCOME vs EGing PV - solar panel manufacturer comparison
EGing PV has the broader catalog (131 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
- Founded
- 2003
- Headquarters
- Changzhou, China
- Listed
- SZSE: 600537
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (76%)
The flagships
Written summary
AKCOME is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Zhejiang province that appeared on BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists through early 2024 and reached a peak annual module production capacity of around 3.8 GW. Its financial position collapsed amid China's solar oversupply crisis: a subsidiary entered court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization in July 2024, and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange terminated AKCOME's listing in August 2024 after shares fell below 1 yuan for 20 consecutive trading days. EGing PV was founded in 2003 and is headquartered in Changzhou, China, with roughly 5 GW of annual production capacity; it retains an active BloombergNEF Tier 1 designation and ships to markets across Europe, Asia, Africa, and Australia. On institutional standing as of mid-2025, EGing PV holds the considerably stronger position.
In terms of product families, EGing PV has moved decisively toward n-type TOPCon technology, with its Star Pro series covering residential rooftop modules in the 425-445 W range and its Aurora Pro series addressing large-format utility-scale and commercial ground-mount applications above 660 W; confirmed panel efficiencies reach 22.8% in the residential line. AKCOME historically promoted HJT technology as a differentiator and offered high-wattage modules suited to commercial and utility applications, but ongoing bankruptcy proceedings make future supply and warranty support deeply uncertain. Performance testing of EGing PV panels has returned mixed results - the brand appeared as a top performer in some PVEL evaluations, yet scored among the lowest in ACT Government accelerated aging tests, suggesting quality consistency is not yet on par with the industry leaders.
For a typical buyer in 2025, EGing PV is the only defensible choice between these two brands. AKCOME's delisting and subsidiary bankruptcy make warranty continuity genuinely unreliable regardless of panel specifications on paper. EGing PV is not a premium brand, and buyers with sufficient budget should consider better-established names first, but it remains a bankable, actively shipping option where AKCOME no longer reliably is.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-21
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers · See 3 EGing PV offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.