Skip to main content

QSun Solar vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

QSun Solar
Headquarters not published
Read the QSun Solar review
VS
Trina Solar
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Trina Solar review
At a glance

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
0 340
Highest power
0 Wp 760 Wp
Best efficiency
- 24.8%
Average efficiency
- 21.7%
Bifacial share
0% 43%
Average warranty
- 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Trina Solar
Founded
1997
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric QSun Solar Trina Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 0 340+340
Max Power 0 W 760 W+760 W
Avg Power 0 W 520 W+520 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency - 24.80%
Avg Efficiency - 21.71%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient - -0.302%/°C
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 145 (43%)+43 pp
Avg Warranty - 28.2 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)

QSun Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
Trina Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
QSun Solar all models
No panels from this manufacturer are in the database yet.
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

QSun Solar is a Chinese photovoltaic module manufacturer headquartered in Chuzhou, Anhui Province, established in 2014. The company operates three manufacturing and research facilities and self-reports annual module deliveries exceeding 4 GW. Notably, QSun Solar does not appear on published BloombergNEF Tier 1 manufacturer lists, which sets it apart from the industry's most bankable names and may limit its suitability for project-financed utility developments. Trina Solar, by contrast, is one of the longest-standing names in the global solar industry, founded in December 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, and employing roughly 30,000 people worldwide. Trina has achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 recognition eight times, including a perfect 100% bankability score from all surveyed financial institutions in 2025. The company surpassed 225 GW in cumulative module shipments by early 2025 and is targeting annual production capacity of around 50 GW. On institutional footprint and financial credibility, Trina Solar holds a commanding lead.

QSun Solar addresses residential, commercial, and utility segments with its Mercury Series of N-type TOPCon modules reaching output levels around 720 W and confirmed mass-production efficiency above 22.5%. The company also produces HJT modules under its Nebula Series and aesthetically oriented full-black panels in the Onyx line, making it a candidate for design-conscious residential rooftop projects. Trina Solar's flagship Vertex series covers large-format N-type TOPCon modules using multi-busbar cell technology, with the Vertex S targeting residential installers and larger Vertex N formats suited to commercial, industrial, and utility-scale ground-mount applications. Trina has appeared on PVEL's Top Performer list for 11 consecutive years, and its 30-year performance warranties on flagship models reflect a level of after-sales commitment that younger brands are still building toward.

For most international buyers - whether residential installers, EPC contractors, or project developers seeking bankable equipment - Trina Solar is the lower-risk default choice, supported by deep institutional recognition and a proven global service network. QSun Solar can be a competitive option for cost-sensitive residential or small commercial projects where non-recourse financing is not a factor, but the absence of a confirmed Tier 1 rating means buyers should factor in additional due diligence before committing to large-scale or financed deployments.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-31

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
QSun Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Trina Solar
Manufacturers
QSun Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Trina Solar
Manufacturers
QSun Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Trina Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 211 Trina Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.