Skip to main content

Q-Cells vs SunLink - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
VS
SunLink
Headquarters not published
Read the SunLink review
At a glance

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 67 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
89 67
Highest power
675 Wp 700 Wp
Best efficiency
23.2% 22.8%
Average efficiency
21.2% 19.9%
Bifacial share
39% 27%
Average warranty
27 yrs 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Q-Cells SunLink
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 89+22 67
Max Power 675 W 700 W+25 W
Avg Power 468 W+70 W 398 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.20%+0.40 pp 22.80%
Avg Efficiency 21.21%+1.28 pp 19.94%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.325%/°C+0.015 -0.340%/°C
Bifacial Share 35 (39%)+12 pp 18 (27%)
Avg Warranty 27.0 yrs+0.2 yr 26.8 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)

Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

SunLink cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (63%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Q-Cells, now operating as Hanwha Q CELLS, traces its roots to Germany, where the brand was founded in 1999 before being acquired by South Korea's Hanwha Group in 2012. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status and operates one of the largest solar manufacturing footprints outside China, including a facility in Cartersville, Georgia rated at 3.3 GW of annual module production, with global cell capacity reported at over 12 GW. SunLink PV is a Chinese manufacturer established in 2004 and headquartered in Zhangjiagang, China. It also carries BloombergNEF Tier 1 status as of Q1 2025 and has accumulated more than 10 GW of installed capacity across over 60 countries, with a notable ramp in annual shipments reported for 2024. Between the two, Q-Cells carries a stronger institutional footprint, backed by a major industrial conglomerate and a domestic U.S. manufacturing presence that provides supply chain and trade-policy advantages.

Q-Cells has historically led with PERC cell technology and is actively developing TOPCon and perovskite-silicon tandem lines, with a record tandem cell efficiency of 28.6% independently verified in late 2024. Its residential lineup is consistently recognized for tight temperature coefficients - a meaningful advantage in hot climates - and the brand ranks highly among independent reviewers for balancing efficiency, warranty terms, and price, with hardware warranties reaching 25 years. SunLink PV competes with both PERC and N-type TOPCon modules, with its flagship TOPCon line reaching conversion efficiencies comparable to Q-Cells at around 22.45%. The brand is positioned primarily for cost-sensitive commercial and utility-scale projects in markets where Chinese supply chains are readily accessible and tariff exposure is lower.

For most buyers in 2025, Q-Cells is the lower-risk default: its U.S. manufacturing base reduces tariff exposure, its warranty track record is well documented across independent platforms, and institutional lenders are more likely to accept it without additional due diligence. SunLink PV is a credible alternative for projects where price sensitivity is the overriding factor and local supply chains favor Chinese-origin equipment.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-11

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Q-Cells A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar SunLink
Manufacturers
Q-Cells AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO SunLink
Manufacturers
Q-Cells AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar SunLink
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers · See 3 SunLink offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.