Skip to main content

Jinko Solar vs Panasonic - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
VS
Panasonic
Japan Founded 1918
Read the Panasonic review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 25 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
637 25
Highest power
735 Wp 430 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 22.2%
Average efficiency
22.2% 20.7%
Bifacial share
36% 16%
Average warranty
29 yrs 25 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Panasonic

Panasonic is a global leader in the development of innovative technologies and solutions for wide-ranging applications in the consumer electronics, housing, automotive, industry, communications, and energy sectors. The company was founded in 1918 by Konosuke Matsushita and has been committed to enhancing the quality...

Founded
1918
Headquarters
Kadoma, near Ōsaka, Japan
Annual capacity
1+ GW/year
Employees
9,500+
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jinko Solar Panasonic
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 637+612 25
Max Power 735 W+305 W 430 W
Avg Power 523 W+155 W 367 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+2.60 pp 22.20%
Avg Efficiency 22.18%+1.49 pp 20.68%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C -0.267%/°C+0.037
Bifacial Share 231 (36%)+20 pp 4 (16%)
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs+3.7 yr 25.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

Panasonic cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (88%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, is one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers, listed on the NYSE with a production capacity of 130 GW and a confirmed Tier 1 bankable status. The company employs over 33,800 people and has surpassed 300 GW of cumulative global shipments, making it a dominant force across every major market. Its portfolio of 545 modules spans output levels up to 735 Wp, with an average efficiency of 22.0% and a laboratory-verified TOPCon cell record of 27.79%, independently confirmed by Germany's ISFH. Panasonic, a Japanese conglomerate founded in 1918 and listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange, built a premium reputation in the residential solar segment through its EverVolt HJT lineup. However, Panasonic formally exited the solar and battery storage business in April 2025, halting all new manufacturing while committing to honor its existing 25-year warranties on installed products.

Jinko's broad lineup - with nearly 32% of its portfolio consisting of bifacial modules and a growing TOPCon share of 39.4% - positions it strongly for utility-scale ground-mount projects, large commercial and industrial (C&I) installations, and any procurement requiring consistent, high-volume supply. The average warranty of 28.5 years across the portfolio adds further financial security for project developers and EPCs. Panasonic's compact range of 25 modules topped out at 430 Wp and 22.2% maximum efficiency, but its defining technical advantage was the HJT temperature coefficient of -0.267%/°C - meaningfully better than Jinko's -0.308%/°C and among the best values in the industry. This made Panasonic panels an outstanding choice for residential rooftop installations in warmer climates, where thermal derating is a significant factor in annual yield.

For buyers making new procurement decisions today, Jinko Solar is the only viable option of the two - offering scale, supply chain depth, competitive pricing, and active product development. Panasonic panels may still surface through distributor stock or secondary markets, and their HJT quality is genuinely excellent, but with manufacturing permanently discontinued, no long-term supply strategy can be built around the brand. Buyers who specifically need low temperature coefficients comparable to Panasonic's HJT performance should explore alternative HJT manufacturers that remain active in production.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Panasonic
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Panasonic
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Panasonic
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers · See 3 Panasonic offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.