Skip to main content

Hyundai vs Panasonic - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Hyundai
South Korea Founded 2004 Tier 1
Read the Hyundai review
VS
Panasonic
Japan Founded 1918
Read the Panasonic review
At a glance

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 25 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
65 25
Highest power
640 Wp 430 Wp
Best efficiency
23.4% 22.2%
Average efficiency
21.5% 20.7%
Bifacial share
66% 16%
Average warranty
27 yrs 25 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Hyundai

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...

Founded
2004
Headquarters
Seongnam-si, South Korea
Annual capacity
1.35 GW/year
Employees
206
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Panasonic

Panasonic is a global leader in the development of innovative technologies and solutions for wide-ranging applications in the consumer electronics, housing, automotive, industry, communications, and energy sectors. The company was founded in 1918 by Konosuke Matsushita and has been committed to enhancing the quality...

Founded
1918
Headquarters
Kadoma, near Ōsaka, Japan
Annual capacity
1+ GW/year
Employees
9,500+
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Hyundai Panasonic
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 65+40 25
Max Power 640 W+210 W 430 W
Avg Power 442 W+75 W 367 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.40%+1.20 pp 22.20%
Avg Efficiency 21.49%+0.81 pp 20.68%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.300%/°C -0.267%/°C+0.033
Bifacial Share 43 (66%)+50 pp 4 (16%)
Avg Warranty 27.4 yrs+2.4 yr 25.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup)

Hyundai cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (38%)

Panasonic cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (88%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Hyundai Energy Solutions, the solar division of South Korea's HD Hyundai conglomerate, has been manufacturing photovoltaic modules since the 1980s and holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status, meaning major financial institutions will finance projects using its panels. The division operates roughly 1.4 GW of annual production capacity and in 2025 secured a 36 MW supply agreement with U.S.-based Turning Point Energy, signaling continued commercial momentum. Panasonic, the Japanese electronics giant, pioneered its proprietary HIT heterojunction cell technology decades ago and long commanded a premium reputation in the residential solar market. However, on April 28, 2025, Panasonic North America announced it would discontinue its entire solar and battery storage business, ending production of the EverVolt line entirely. Hyundai therefore enters this comparison as an active, growing manufacturer while Panasonic is now a legacy brand with no new supply.

In terms of product families, Hyundai offers residential-oriented panels in its XG Series and bifacial modules in its YH Series suited to ground-mount and small commercial applications, using N-type TOPCon and shingled cell technology. Panasonic's EverVolt HK2 and PK2 series, built on HJT architecture with efficiency ratings confirmed above 22%, were widely regarded as among the best panels for space-constrained residential rooftops and high-temperature climates, thanks to industry-leading temperature coefficients. Panasonic's EverVolt panels were manufactured under an OEM arrangement with REC Group, and reviewers suggest the REC Alpha Pure-RX as the closest current equivalent for buyers who sought Panasonic quality.

For any buyer evaluating these two brands in 2025 or beyond, the choice is effectively settled by Panasonic's market exit. Hyundai Energy Solutions is the only viable option for new installations - offering solid Tier 1 bankability, a competitive mid-range price point, and active warranty support. Buyers who specifically want HJT technology comparable to the retired EverVolt line should look at REC Group or other active HJT manufacturers rather than sourcing remaining Panasonic stock.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Hyundai A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Panasonic
Manufacturers
Hyundai AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Panasonic
Manufacturers
Hyundai AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Panasonic
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 41 Hyundai offers · See 1 Panasonic offer

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.