Skip to main content

Hyundai vs Kyocera - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Hyundai
South Korea Founded 2004 Tier 1
Read the Hyundai review
VS
Kyocera
Japan Founded 1959
Read the Kyocera review
At a glance

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 8 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
65 8
Highest power
640 Wp 410 Wp
Best efficiency
23.4% 21.0%
Average efficiency
21.5% 18.2%
Bifacial share
66% 0%
Average warranty
27 yrs 25 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Hyundai

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...

Founded
2004
Headquarters
Seongnam-si, South Korea
Annual capacity
1.35 GW/year
Employees
206
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Kyocera

Kyocera Corporation is a Japanese multinational electronics and ceramics manufacturer. Founded in 1959, the company produces a diverse range of products, including industrial ceramics, solar power generating systems, telecommunications equipment, and office document imaging equipment. Kyocera is committed to...

Founded
1959
Headquarters
Kyoto, Japan
Employees
77,136
Listed
TYO: 6971
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Hyundai Kyocera
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 65+57 8
Max Power 640 W+230 W 410 W
Avg Power 442 W+140 W 302 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.40%+2.40 pp 21.00%
Avg Efficiency 21.49%+3.28 pp 18.21%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.300%/°C+0.160 -0.460%/°C
Bifacial Share 43 (66%)+66 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 27.4 yrs+2.4 yr 25.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup)

Hyundai cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (38%)

Kyocera cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Hyundai Energy Solutions, a division of South Korea's HD Hyundai industrial group, has been producing photovoltaic modules since the early 2000s and maintains an active commercial presence in North America, Europe, and Asia. The brand draws institutional credibility from its parent conglomerate's scale and engineering heritage. Kyocera is a Japanese ceramics and electronics conglomerate founded in 1959 that is widely credited as one of the earliest pioneers of commercial solar technology, having begun photovoltaic production in 1975. However, Kyocera withdrew from North American solar sales in 2016 and has since significantly scaled back its global module business, concentrating almost entirely on the Japanese domestic market. On the basis of current market reach and active distribution, Hyundai Energy Solutions holds the considerably stronger institutional footprint.

Hyundai Energy Solutions offers a tiered residential lineup that includes a standard monocrystalline series and a bifacial series for space-constrained rooftops. The company launched new N-type TOPCon modules at the RE+ 2024 trade show, marking a technology step up from its earlier PERC-based products. Panels are backed by a 25-year product and performance warranty and are generally priced below premium brands, positioning them as solid mid-market residential options. Kyocera's current catalog, where available, consists of conventional monocrystalline modules sold primarily into the Japanese residential segment. Its panels have earned a durable reputation for longevity - long-term field studies of Kyocera arrays from the 1980s and 1990s show unusually low degradation rates - but peak efficiency and technology generation trail the current mainstream.

For a buyer in 2025 outside Japan, Hyundai Energy Solutions is the more practical default choice. Its modules are actively distributed, carry a supported manufacturer warranty, and now include TOPCon options aligned with current efficiency expectations. Kyocera retains genuine historical credibility and an impressive durability record, but its limited international availability and reduced technology roadmap make it a difficult fit for most new residential or commercial installations in North America or Europe.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-17

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Hyundai A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Kyocera
Manufacturers
Hyundai AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Kyocera
Manufacturers
Hyundai AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Kyocera
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 42 Hyundai offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.