Skip to main content

AIKO vs Kyocera - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AIKO
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the AIKO review
VS
Kyocera
Japan Founded 1959
Read the Kyocera review
At a glance

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 8 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
144 8
Highest power
805 Wp 410 Wp
Best efficiency
25.2% 21.0%
Average efficiency
23.7% 18.2%
Bifacial share
24% 0%
Average warranty
30 yrs 25 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
AIKO
Founded
2009
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Kyocera

Kyocera Corporation is a Japanese multinational electronics and ceramics manufacturer. Founded in 1959, the company produces a diverse range of products, including industrial ceramics, solar power generating systems, telecommunications equipment, and office document imaging equipment. Kyocera is committed to...

Founded
1959
Headquarters
Kyoto, Japan
Employees
77,136
Listed
TYO: 6971
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric AIKO Kyocera
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 144+136 8
Max Power 805 W+395 W 410 W
Avg Power 581 W+280 W 302 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 25.20%+4.20 pp 21.00%
Avg Efficiency 23.65%+5.44 pp 18.21%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.271%/°C+0.189 -0.460%/°C
Bifacial Share 35 (24%)+24 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 29.5 yrs+4.5 yr 25.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)

AIKO cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)

Kyocera cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Kyocera is a Japanese conglomerate headquartered in Kyoto, founded in 1959, with a solar division that began manufacturing photovoltaic modules as far back as 1975 - making it one of the earliest commercial solar panel producers in the world. The company retains a strong institutional presence in Japan and parts of Asia, but it withdrew from North American sales in 2016 and has not appeared on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 module manufacturer lists in recent years, reflecting its reduced role in the global volume market. Its current commercial footprint is concentrated in Japan, where it continues to develop products, including a 410 W snow-load-resistant module launched in early 2025. AIKO, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Guangdong, founded around 2009, that has achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and has been rapidly scaling production capacity across multiple gigawatt-scale facilities in China. In terms of global institutional recognition and bankability in 2025, AIKO holds the stronger position.

Kyocera's current Japanese-market panels use monocrystalline technology with efficiencies reported at over 22%, a meaningful step up from the polycrystalline products the company was known for historically. The product focus is largely residential and light commercial in Japan, with a heritage warranty stance and niche snow-country durability products. AIKO has built its identity around ABC (All Back Contact) n-type cell technology, placing both contacts on the rear of the cell to minimize shading losses. A module using this technology achieved a world-record efficiency of 25.2% at Intersolar 2024 according to PV Magazine. AIKO targets premium residential rooftops and is expanding toward utility-scale ground-mount markets globally, and it took first place in the 2025 SolarQuotes Installers' Choice Awards in Australia.

For most buyers outside Japan in 2025, AIKO is the more practical default: it is bankable by BloombergNEF standards, widely available internationally, built on a leading cell technology, and backed by verifiable installer feedback. Kyocera remains a credible choice for buyers in Japan who value the company's long operational track record and domestic service network, but it is essentially absent from competitive global procurement.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-16

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
AIKO A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Kyocera
Manufacturers
AIKO AEET
Manufacturers
AKCOME Kyocera
Manufacturers
AIKO ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM Kyocera
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 179 AIKO offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.