HY SOLAR vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 91 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. HY SOLAR leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
- Founded
- 1997
- Headquarters
- Changzhou, China
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
HY SOLAR skews to higher efficiency: 54% of lineup is 23%+
HY SOLAR offers more 600W+ panels (51% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (100%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)
The flagships
Written summary
HY SOLAR is a Chinese manufacturer operating under the legal name Hongyuan Green Energy Co., Ltd., founded in 2002 and publicly listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange since 2018. The company has developed a vertically integrated production chain - covering silicon feedstock, wafers, cells, and finished modules - with manufacturing facilities spread across Inner Mongolia, Jiangsu, and Anhui provinces. HY SOLAR states that its products reach close to 100 countries, but the brand has not appeared on publicly available BloombergNEF Tier 1 module bankability lists, which places it in a materially different institutional category from the global top tier. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu, is firmly established among the world's top three module manufacturers: it shipped approximately 77 GW of modules in 2024, has held BNEF Tier 1 status for seven consecutive years, and reports cumulative shipments exceeding 205 GW across more than 100 countries. On institutional footprint alone, Trina Solar leads by a considerable margin.
HY SOLAR's product catalog includes N-type modules under its HY-NT series, covering both standard residential formats and larger-format panels aimed at commercial applications - indicating a clear pivot toward higher-efficiency cell technology. The brand is typically positioned as a cost-competitive, vertically integrated supplier suited to installers who prioritize supply-chain control and price. Trina Solar's core offering is its Vertex N family, underpinned by the company's proprietary i-TOPCon Ultra technology. The range spans a 485 W panel for residential rooftops up to a 760 W large-format module achieving 24.5% efficiency for utility-scale ground-mounted arrays. The Vertex S+ G3 targets residential and light commercial segments, while the Vertex N i-TOPCon Ultra is designed for C&I and utility projects. Trina Solar has filed more than 700 patents and has already commenced the global rollout of its TOPCon 2.0 generation.
For most international buyers evaluating projects that require project financing or lender approval, Trina Solar is the cleaner default: its documented Tier 1 status, transparent shipment volumes, and established global service network reduce bankability friction. HY SOLAR can be a reasonable option for smaller, self-financed installations or price-sensitive markets where BNEF bankability is not a lender requirement, but buyers should independently verify warranty terms and regional after-sales coverage before committing.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-14
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 249 Trina Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.