Skip to main content

HY SOLAR vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

HY SOLAR
Headquarters not published
Read the HY SOLAR review
VS
Trina Solar
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Trina Solar review
At a glance

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 91 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. HY SOLAR leans bifacial (100% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
91 340
Highest power
730 Wp 760 Wp
Best efficiency
23.8% 24.8%
Average efficiency
22.9% 21.7%
Bifacial share
100% 43%
Average warranty
30 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Trina Solar
Founded
1997
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric HY SOLAR Trina Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 91 340+249
Max Power 730 W 760 W+30 W
Avg Power 571 W+51 W 520 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.80% 24.80%+1.00 pp
Avg Efficiency 22.94%+1.23 pp 21.71%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.290%/°C+0.012 -0.302%/°C
Bifacial Share 91 (100%)+57 pp 145 (43%)
Avg Warranty 30.0 yrs+1.8 yr 28.2 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

HY SOLAR skews to higher efficiency: 54% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

HY SOLAR offers more 600W+ panels (51% of lineup)

HY SOLAR cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (100%)

Trina Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

HY SOLAR is a Chinese manufacturer operating under the legal name Hongyuan Green Energy Co., Ltd., founded in 2002 and publicly listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange since 2018. The company has developed a vertically integrated production chain - covering silicon feedstock, wafers, cells, and finished modules - with manufacturing facilities spread across Inner Mongolia, Jiangsu, and Anhui provinces. HY SOLAR states that its products reach close to 100 countries, but the brand has not appeared on publicly available BloombergNEF Tier 1 module bankability lists, which places it in a materially different institutional category from the global top tier. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu, is firmly established among the world's top three module manufacturers: it shipped approximately 77 GW of modules in 2024, has held BNEF Tier 1 status for seven consecutive years, and reports cumulative shipments exceeding 205 GW across more than 100 countries. On institutional footprint alone, Trina Solar leads by a considerable margin.

HY SOLAR's product catalog includes N-type modules under its HY-NT series, covering both standard residential formats and larger-format panels aimed at commercial applications - indicating a clear pivot toward higher-efficiency cell technology. The brand is typically positioned as a cost-competitive, vertically integrated supplier suited to installers who prioritize supply-chain control and price. Trina Solar's core offering is its Vertex N family, underpinned by the company's proprietary i-TOPCon Ultra technology. The range spans a 485 W panel for residential rooftops up to a 760 W large-format module achieving 24.5% efficiency for utility-scale ground-mounted arrays. The Vertex S+ G3 targets residential and light commercial segments, while the Vertex N i-TOPCon Ultra is designed for C&I and utility projects. Trina Solar has filed more than 700 patents and has already commenced the global rollout of its TOPCon 2.0 generation.

For most international buyers evaluating projects that require project financing or lender approval, Trina Solar is the cleaner default: its documented Tier 1 status, transparent shipment volumes, and established global service network reduce bankability friction. HY SOLAR can be a reasonable option for smaller, self-financed installations or price-sensitive markets where BNEF bankability is not a lender requirement, but buyers should independently verify warranty terms and regional after-sales coverage before committing.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-14

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
HY SOLAR A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Trina Solar
Manufacturers
HY SOLAR AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Trina Solar
Manufacturers
HY SOLAR AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Trina Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 249 Trina Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.