Skip to main content

Gintech vs Hyundai - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Gintech
Taiwan Founded 2005
Read the Gintech review
VS
Hyundai
South Korea Founded 2004 Tier 1
Read the Hyundai review
At a glance

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 7 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
7 65
Highest power
365 Wp 640 Wp
Best efficiency
18.8% 23.4%
Average efficiency
16.6% 21.5%
Bifacial share
0% 66%
Average warranty
25 yrs 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Gintech

Gintech Energy Corporation was a Taiwanese manufacturer of crystalline silicon solar cells and modules, founded in 2005 and headquartered in Zhunan, Hsinchu Science Park. The company produced mono- and multi-crystalline solar cells under its Diamond, Douro, and Phoenix product lines. In January 2018, Gintech merged...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Zhunan (Hsinchu Science Park), Taiwan
Employees
1000-2000
Hyundai

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...

Founded
2004
Headquarters
Seongnam-si, South Korea
Annual capacity
1.35 GW/year
Employees
206
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Gintech Hyundai
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 7 65+58
Max Power 365 W 640 W+275 W
Avg Power 281 W 442 W+161 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 18.80% 23.40%+4.60 pp
Avg Efficiency 16.61% 21.49%+4.88 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.416%/°C -0.300%/°C+0.115
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 43 (66%)+66 pp
Avg Warranty 25.0 yrs 27.4 yrs+2.4 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup)

Gintech cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (29%)

Hyundai cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (38%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Gintech Energy Corporation was a Taiwanese solar cell manufacturer founded in 2006 and listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange in 2007. The company scaled aggressively through the late 2000s and early 2010s, at one point operating one of the largest single-building solar cell plants in the world. In 2018, Gintech merged with fellow Taiwanese firms Neo Solar Power and Solartech to form United Renewable Energy Co. (URE), and the Gintech brand effectively ceased to exist as an independent entity. URE carries forward Gintech's manufacturing heritage with combined cell capacity of approximately 2.5 GW spread across Taiwan, Vietnam, and Thailand. HD Hyundai Energy Solutions, by contrast, is a South Korean manufacturer founded in 2004 and operating as a subsidiary of the broader HD Hyundai industrial group. It holds confirmed Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankability status and runs production facilities with roughly 1.35-1.4 GW of annual capacity located in South Korea. On institutional footprint and current market visibility, Hyundai has the clearer and more active presence.

Because Gintech no longer markets panels under its own name - its assets and lines having been absorbed into URE - a direct product comparison is difficult. URE's current lineup has been built around PERC technology, with a stated transition toward TOPCon underway in 2025 as it consolidates those production lines at its Tainan factory. Hyundai, by contrast, actively markets a defined product family: the XG and YH series for residential use, and the HiN-T range for commercial and utility-scale applications, all built around N-type TOPCon cell technology produced under license in-house. The HiN-T 640 W module received PVEL PQP Top Performer recognition in 2025, providing independent third-party validation of module reliability.

For a buyer searching for panels today, Hyundai is the practical choice between these two names. Gintech as a standalone brand is no longer actively sold through normal channels, meaning any panels carrying that label would represent legacy or old-stock inventory. Hyundai offers a current catalog, confirmed bankability, a maturing TOPCon portfolio, and independent test-performance recognition, making it the default recommendation by a significant margin.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Gintech A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Hyundai
Manufacturers
Gintech AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Hyundai
Manufacturers
Gintech AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Hyundai
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 42 Hyundai offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.