Skip to main content

FoxESS vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

FoxESS
China Founded 2019 Tier 1
Read the FoxESS review
VS
Trina Solar
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Trina Solar review
At a glance

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
0 340
Highest power
0 Wp 760 Wp
Best efficiency
- 24.8%
Average efficiency
- 21.7%
Bifacial share
0% 43%
Average warranty
- 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
FoxESS

FoxESS is a global leader in inverter and energy storage solutions, backed by the Fortune Global 500 Tsingshan Group. The company specializes in hybrid inverters, lithium battery storage systems, and smart energy management platforms for residential and commercial applications. With operations in over 70 countries and...

Founded
2019
Headquarters
Wenzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Trina Solar
Founded
1997
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric FoxESS Trina Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 0 340+340
Max Power 0 W 760 W+760 W
Avg Power 0 W 520 W+520 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency - 24.80%
Avg Efficiency - 21.71%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient - -0.302%/°C
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 145 (43%)+43 pp
Avg Warranty - 28.2 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)

FoxESS cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
Trina Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
FoxESS all models
No panels from this manufacturer are in the database yet.
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

FoxESS is a Chinese energy technology company headquartered in Wenzhou, founded in 2019 as a subsidiary of the Tsingshan Holding Group, one of the world's largest stainless-steel producers. Its product portfolio is built around solar inverters, LiFePO4 battery storage systems, and EV chargers - the company does not manufacture solar photovoltaic modules and therefore does not appear on BloombergNEF Tier 1 solar panel lists. Despite its recent founding, FoxESS has grown rapidly: it holds over 35% market share in the UK residential solar-and-storage segment and ranks second globally for residential energy storage shipments. The company raised $141M in a single Series D round in 2023 and operates R&D centers across five Chinese cities. Trina Solar, by contrast, is a founding-era player in the PV industry, established in 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province by Gao Jifan. With cumulative global shipments exceeding 292 GW as of mid-2025 and planned annual production capacity of around 50 GW, Trina is one of the largest solar module manufacturers in the world. It has achieved BloombergNEF 100% bankability status eight times and has been a PVEL Top Performer for eleven consecutive years, making it one of the most institutionally trusted brands in the industry.

The two brands occupy fundamentally different product categories. FoxESS addresses the inverter and storage layer of a solar installation, with single-phase and three-phase hybrid inverters ranging from 3 kW to 25 kW suited to residential and light commercial use cases. Installers sourcing FoxESS equipment still need to select a separate panel brand - in practice, FoxESS inverters are frequently paired with modules from Tier 1 manufacturers such as Trina Solar. Trina Solar, meanwhile, focuses entirely on the module side: its Vertex S+ series uses N-type TOPCon cells with efficiency ratings up to 22.6%, targeting residential rooftop, commercial C&I, and utility-scale ground-mount applications. The Vertex series at higher wattages above 600 Wp is especially common in large-scale project procurement, where bankability and long-term warranty coverage - Trina offers 30-year performance guarantees on flagship lines - are decisive factors.

For a buyer evaluating complete solar systems, FoxESS and Trina Solar are complementary rather than competing choices: an FoxESS inverter paired with Trina Solar panels is a well-regarded combination among international installers. As a standalone solar panel manufacturer, Trina Solar is the clear reference point - its scale, technology maturity, and unmatched bankability credentials make it the default for buyers from small residential projects up to utility-scale procurement. FoxESS earns its place as a strong inverter and storage brand, but the two are not interchangeable within the same product category.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-07-05

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
FoxESS A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Trina Solar
Manufacturers
FoxESS AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Trina Solar
Manufacturers
FoxESS AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Trina Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 242 Trina Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.