Skip to main content

AIKO vs Seraphim - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AIKO
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the AIKO review
VS
Seraphim
China Founded 2011 Tier 1
Read the Seraphim review
At a glance

Seraphim has the broader catalog (160 vs 144 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Seraphim leans bifacial (69% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
144 160
Highest power
805 Wp 730 Wp
Best efficiency
25.2% 23.5%
Average efficiency
23.7% 21.8%
Bifacial share
24% 69%
Average warranty
30 yrs 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
AIKO
Founded
2009
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Seraphim

Seraphim is a world-class solar products manufacturer specializing in research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant milestones, outpacing competitors in production capacity and innovative designs. Seraphim is committed to technological innovation and...

Founded
2011
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Annual capacity
13 GW/year
Employees
1001-5000
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric AIKO Seraphim
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 144 160+16
Max Power 805 W+75 W 730 W
Avg Power 581 W+32 W 549 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 25.20%+1.70 pp 23.50%
Avg Efficiency 23.65%+1.83 pp 21.82%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.271%/°C+0.046 -0.316%/°C
Bifacial Share 35 (24%) 111 (69%)+45 pp
Avg Warranty 29.5 yrs+0.8 yr 28.8 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)

AIKO cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)

Seraphim cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (52%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

AIKO (Shanghai Aiko Solar Energy Co., Ltd.) was founded in 2009 and is headquartered in Shanghai, operating a vertically integrated manufacturing network across sites such as Yiwu, Foshan, Zhuhai and Jinan, with an R&D hub at Solarlab AIKO Europe in Freiburg, Germany. The company earned BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in Q3 2024 and now runs annual production capacity of roughly 35.5 GW, placing it among the top ten module makers by scale. Seraphim, founded in 2011 and based in Changzhou, Jiangsu, has held BNEF Tier 1 status for eleven consecutive years since 2015 and operates roughly 13 GW of global capacity across six manufacturing bases in China and South Africa - on institutional footprint and current production scale, AIKO is the larger and more recently ascendant of the two.

AIKO's product line is built around its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) cell technology, which moves all contacts to the rear of the cell to boost active surface area, delivering commercial efficiencies above 24% along with a clean, uniform aesthetic that is particularly well suited to residential rooftop installations, though AIKO also markets ABC modules for commercial and utility-scale use. Seraphim takes a more conventional, diversified approach centered on TOPCon modules (its Sable and Nebula series), supplemented by PERC, HJT and lightweight dual-glass panels, with higher-power variants up to 730 W aimed at commercial and utility-scale projects.

For buyers prioritizing aesthetics and maximum efficiency per square meter on residential or constrained rooftops, AIKO's ABC technology is generally the stronger default choice. For large commercial or ground-mount projects where cost per watt and a long, proven Tier 1 track record matter most, Seraphim remains a dependable and typically more price-competitive alternative, though the gap in headline efficiency between the two brands has narrowed in recent product generations.

Generated by Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-10-01

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
AIKO A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Seraphim
Manufacturers
AIKO AEET
Manufacturers
AKCOME Seraphim
Manufacturers
AIKO ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM Seraphim
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 173 AIKO offers · See 4 Seraphim offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.