Skip to main content

AIKO vs HD Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AIKO
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the AIKO review
VS
HD Solar
Headquarters not published
Read the HD Solar review
At a glance

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 7 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. HD Solar leans bifacial (100% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
144 7
Highest power
805 Wp 635 Wp
Best efficiency
25.2% 23.5%
Average efficiency
23.7% 23.0%
Bifacial share
24% 100%
Average warranty
30 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
AIKO
Founded
2009
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric AIKO HD Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 144+137 7
Max Power 805 W+170 W 635 W
Avg Power 581 W 620 W+39 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 25.20%+1.70 pp 23.50%
Avg Efficiency 23.65%+0.69 pp 22.96%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.271%/°C+0.029 -0.300%/°C
Bifacial Share 35 (24%) 7 (100%)+76 pp
Avg Warranty 29.5 yrs 30.0 yrs+0.5 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

HD Solar offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)

AIKO cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)

HD Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (100%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

HD Solar and AIKO represent two very different tiers of market presence. AIKO was founded in 2009, is headquartered in China, and trades on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE). It has achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankable status - a designation held by roughly the top 2% of the roughly 17,000 solar manufacturers worldwide - and operates six major production facilities, having shipped more than 2 GW in Q1 2025 alone. HD Solar, by contrast, carries no Tier 1 bankable classification, has no disclosed founding date, stock exchange listing, or verifiable production-capacity figure, and its catalogue spans just 7 panel models. For any project requiring lender approval or long-horizon warranty security, AIKO has a materially stronger institutional footprint.

On paper performance, the two lineups overlap but diverge in character. HD Solar runs an entirely TOPCon, 100% bifacial portfolio averaging 620 Wp and 23.0% efficiency, peaking at 635 Wp and 23.5%, with a temperature coefficient of -0.30%/degree C and a 30-year product warranty - a clean, uniform offering suited to utility-scale ground mounts or large commercial rooftops where bifacial gain and predictable spec sheets matter. AIKO leans on its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) cell architecture, which underpins about 74% of its 144-model range and drives a higher average efficiency of 23.7% and a best-in-class peak of 25.2%, with a milder temperature coefficient of -0.27%/degree C and a maximum panel output of 805 Wp. Only 24% of AIKO's portfolio is bifacial, however, so buyers seeking rear-side gains across the whole product range will find HD Solar a simpler match. AIKO's warranty averages 29.5 years - marginally shorter than HD Solar's uniform 30-year commitment.

For a typical buyer in 2025, AIKO is the more defensible default: the Tier 1 rating reduces financing friction, the ABC technology leads commercial silicon efficiency benchmarks, and the large installed base provides real-world performance data. HD Solar's fully bifacial, all-TOPCon lineup is technically coherent and carries a slightly longer warranty, but the absence of Tier 1 bankability is a meaningful risk for financed or large-scale projects. For smaller cash-purchased installations where bankability is irrelevant, the two lineups are closer - though AIKO's efficiency edge and broader module range still give it the advantage.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
AIKO A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar HD Solar
Manufacturers
AIKO AEET
Manufacturers
AKCOME HD Solar
Manufacturers
AIKO ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM HD Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 174 AIKO offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.