Skip to main content

Trina Solar vs ZNShine - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Trina Solar
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Trina Solar review
VS
ZNShine
China Founded 1988 Tier 1
Read the ZNShine review
At a glance

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 212 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
340 212
Highest power
760 Wp 670 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 22.8%
Average efficiency
21.7% 21.3%
Bifacial share
43% 42%
Average warranty
28 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Trina Solar
Founded
1997
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
ZNShine

ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...

Founded
1988
Headquarters
Suqian, China
Annual capacity
10 GW/year
Employees
1,200
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Trina Solar ZNShine
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 340+128 212
Max Power 760 W+90 W 670 W
Avg Power 520 W 535 W+14 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+1.97 pp 22.83%
Avg Efficiency 21.71%+0.37 pp 21.35%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.302%/°C+0.027 -0.329%/°C
Bifacial Share 145 (43%)+1 pp 89 (42%)
Avg Warranty 28.2 yrs 28.3 yrs+0.1 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)

Trina Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)

ZNShine cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (63%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Trina Solar and ZNShine are both Chinese Tier 1 bankable manufacturers, yet they occupy distinct positions in the global solar market. Trina Solar, founded in 1997, has grown into one of the world's top-five module suppliers, supported by a consistent track record as a PVEL Top Performer and wide geographic distribution across European, American, and Asian markets. ZNShine, the older of the two companies (established in 1988) and listed on China's NEEQ exchange, reports a production capacity of 10 GW and a workforce of approximately 1,200 employees. Both manufacturers carry Tier 1 bankability status, qualifying them for mainstream project finance, though Trina Solar's deeper international footprint and broader third-party validation give it the edge in brand recognition among European and North American buyers.

On the technology side, Trina Solar has made a decisive pivot toward N-type TOPCon cells, which now represent nearly 70% of its 305-model portfolio - enabling a peak module efficiency of 24.1% and a maximum power output of 740 Wp. Its average temperature coefficient of -0.304%/°C is meaningfully better than ZNShine's -0.329%/°C, an advantage that compounds over time in warm climates and makes Trina a strong candidate for residential rooftop installations, commercial C&I projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount arrays alike. ZNShine's portfolio remains anchored in PERC technology (roughly 63% of its 212-model range), but the company partially offsets this with a higher average module power of 534.5 Wp and a slightly larger bifacial share of approximately 42%, positioning its lineup well for ground-mounted utility-scale projects using single-axis trackers. ZNShine's graphene-coated glass and double-glass bifacial modules add differentiated durability value for installations in harsh or hard-to-access environments. Average warranty terms are nearly identical at around 28 years for both brands.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Trina Solar is the lower-risk choice when technology leadership, long-term reliability data, and global service coverage are primary criteria - particularly for residential and commercial projects in Europe. ZNShine offers a competitive value proposition for price-sensitive utility-scale procurement where high per-module power output and bifacial yield are the key selection drivers, provided the buyer verifies regional after-sales support and supply chain stability before committing to large volumes.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Trina Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar ZNShine
Manufacturers
Trina Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO ZNShine
Manufacturers
Trina Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar ZNShine
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 248 Trina Solar offers · See 12 ZNShine offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.