Skip to main content

Trina Solar vs AKCOME - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Trina Solar
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Trina Solar review
VS
AKCOME
China Founded 2003
Read the AKCOME review
At a glance

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 3 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
340 3
Highest power
760 Wp 700 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 22.5%
Average efficiency
21.7% 21.6%
Bifacial share
43% 100%
Average warranty
28 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Trina Solar
Founded
1997
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
AKCOME
Founded
2003
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Trina Solar AKCOME
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 340+337 3
Max Power 760 W+60 W 700 W
Avg Power 520 W 672 W+152 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+2.26 pp 22.54%
Avg Efficiency 21.71%+0.09 pp 21.63%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.302%/°C -0.240%/°C+0.062
Bifacial Share 145 (43%) 3 (100%)+57 pp
Avg Warranty 28.2 yrs 30.0 yrs+1.8 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)

Trina Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)

AKCOME cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

AKCOME is a Chinese photovoltaic manufacturer based in Jiangsu Province that built its identity around heterojunction (HJT) cell technology and reached a peak module production capacity of approximately 3.8 GW per year. For a period the company featured on BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists, signaling basic bankability, but its financial position deteriorated sharply in 2024. A key subsidiary entered court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization in July 2024, the Shenzhen Stock Exchange delisted AKCOME shares in August 2024 after they fell below one yuan for 20 consecutive trading days, and PV ModuleTech downgraded the company to a CC+ bankability rating - the agency's low-investment-reliability tier. By January 2025, AKCOME had been removed from the TaiyangNews TOP SOLAR MODULES ranking because its website had become inaccessible. Trina Solar, headquartered in Changzhou, China, and founded in 1997, is one of the most established names in the global PV industry. It maintains a consistent BloombergNEF Tier 1 rating and is grouped alongside LONGi, Jinko Solar, and JA Solar as a top-tier manufacturer, with a stated production capacity exceeding 100 GW. On every institutional measure, Trina Solar carries a significantly stronger and more stable market footprint.

In terms of technology and product families, AKCOME had focused primarily on HJT modules - a cell architecture prized for high efficiency and low temperature coefficients - but the company's effective withdrawal from active business since late 2024 makes warranty fulfillment and after-sales support highly uncertain for any buyer considering existing AKCOME inventory. Trina Solar, by contrast, maintains a well-supported and actively expanding portfolio built on n-type TOPCon technology. Its Vertex S+ series targets residential rooftops and light commercial applications, offering dual-glass bifacial modules with output around 445 W and efficiencies above 22%. The Vertex N series addresses commercial, industrial, and utility-scale ground-mount projects, with output reaching beyond 740 W and module efficiencies confirmed above 23%. Trina has also achieved a world-record TOPCon cell efficiency of 26.58% in laboratory conditions, and its 2,000-V utility modules were the first of their size class to receive UL 61730 certification.

For most international buyers - whether procuring panels for a residential rooftop, a commercial C&I portfolio, or a large-scale ground-mount project - Trina Solar is the clear default recommendation. Financial stability, active global distribution, credible 25-year product and 30-year linear power warranties, and continuous product innovation all point decisively in Trina's favor. Purchasing modules from a manufacturer currently in insolvency proceedings, as AKCOME is, introduces serious risk of unenforceable warranties and no post-sale support over a 25-30 year asset life - a risk that no efficiency advantage could reasonably offset.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-28

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Trina Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
Trina Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO AKCOME
Manufacturers
Trina Solar ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM AKCOME
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 248 Trina Solar offers · See 2 AKCOME offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.