Skip to main content

Q-Cells vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
VS
Trina Solar
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Trina Solar review
At a glance

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 89 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
89 340
Highest power
675 Wp 760 Wp
Best efficiency
23.2% 24.8%
Average efficiency
21.2% 21.7%
Bifacial share
39% 43%
Average warranty
27 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Trina Solar
Founded
1997
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Q-Cells Trina Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 89 340+251
Max Power 675 W 760 W+85 W
Avg Power 468 W 520 W+52 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.20% 24.80%+1.60 pp
Avg Efficiency 21.21% 21.71%+0.50 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.325%/°C -0.302%/°C+0.023
Bifacial Share 35 (39%) 145 (43%)+3 pp
Avg Warranty 27.0 yrs 28.2 yrs+1.2 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)

Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

Trina Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Q-Cells is the solar division of South Korean conglomerate Hanwha, built on the engineering heritage of the original German Q-Cells company, which Hanwha acquired in 2012. The division runs a combined annual production capacity of approximately 11.3 GW across its global manufacturing sites, including the largest solar module factory in the Western Hemisphere, located in Dalton, Georgia. Q-Cells holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status and ranked third in SolarReviews' top solar panel manufacturers list for 2025. Trina Solar is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu province. It has accumulated total global shipments exceeding 292 GW and in 2025 received a 100% bankability rating from BloombergNEF - the eighth time it has topped that survey - making it one of the most widely recognized names in institutional solar procurement. By the metric of project finance exposure and global shipping volume, Trina Solar carries the stronger institutional footprint of the two.

Q-Cells serves the full spectrum from residential rooftop to utility-scale ground-mount through product families that include Q.TRON, Q.PEAK DUO, and Q.PLUS. Its Q.ANTUM NEO platform is based on N-type TOPCon cells treated with a nano-coating that improves low-light performance; the Q.TRON G2 series achieves efficiency ratings above 22.5%, while the QTron M-G2+ BLK launched in early 2025 approaches 23.7%. The brand carries additional weight in supply-chain-sensitive markets given its substantial domestic US production. Trina Solar addresses the same segments through its Vertex N series, which is built around the i-TOPCon Ultra cell technology introduced in late 2024 and described by the company as a TOPCon 2.0 platform. Vertex N modules use large-format 210 mm wafers and reach efficiencies comparable to Q-Cells' premium lines. Trina has been named a TOP Performer by Kiwa PVEL for eleven consecutive years, underlining long-term product reliability.

For most buyers the choice between Q-Cells and Trina Solar is genuinely close. Both are BloombergNEF Tier 1 manufacturers offering N-type TOPCon modules with strong reliability track records. Q-Cells is the more natural default for buyers who prioritize supply chain transparency, domestic US manufacturing, or markets where European engineering heritage and detailed warranty terms carry weight. Trina Solar is typically the stronger fit for large utility-scale procurement in international markets, where its BNEF bankability scores and cumulative shipment history simplify project financing. In residential and commercial segments the two brands are largely interchangeable, and the final selection most often comes down to installer relationships, regional pricing, and module availability.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-14

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Q-Cells A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Trina Solar
Manufacturers
Q-Cells AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Trina Solar
Manufacturers
Q-Cells AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Trina Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers · See 248 Trina Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.