Skip to main content

Q-Cells vs Solarspace - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
VS
Solarspace
China Founded 2011 Tier 1
Read the Solarspace review
At a glance

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 82 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Solarspace leans bifacial (93% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
89 82
Highest power
675 Wp 710 Wp
Best efficiency
23.2% 23.2%
Average efficiency
21.2% 22.0%
Bifacial share
39% 93%
Average warranty
27 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Solarspace

SolarSpace is a world-leading solar cell and module manufacturer, focusing on high-efficiency solar technology production both in China and overseas. They are among the top solar cell manufacturers, providing high-quality solar modules with core cell technology worldwide. SolarSpace is dedicated to empowering solar...

Founded
2011
Headquarters
Xuzhou, China
Annual capacity
60+ GW/year
Employees
6000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Q-Cells Solarspace
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 89+7 82
Max Power 675 W 710 W+35 W
Avg Power 468 W 539 W+71 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.20%+0.04 pp 23.16%
Avg Efficiency 21.21% 22.04%+0.82 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.325%/°C -0.299%/°C+0.025
Bifacial Share 35 (39%) 76 (93%)+53 pp
Avg Warranty 27.0 yrs 29.6 yrs+2.7 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Solarspace skews to higher efficiency: 4% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Solarspace offers more 600W+ panels (33% of lineup)

Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

Solarspace cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>N-type</strong> (70%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Q-Cells is the consumer-facing brand of Hanwha Q CELLS, a division of South Korea's Hanwha Group, which acquired the original German Q-Cells company - founded in 1999 in Bitterfeld-Wolfen, Germany - in 2012. The brand holds a consistent position on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 bankability list and operates the largest solar manufacturing complex in the Western Hemisphere in Dalton, Georgia, with a U.S. module facility in Cartersville targeting roughly 3.3 GW of annual capacity. Solarspace is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2011 that has grown into a major cell supplier - PV InfoLink ranked it second globally in solar cell shipments in 2024 - with reported n-type cell production capacity exceeding 40 GW and around 6 GW of module output capacity. Solarspace rejoined the BNEF Tier 1 module list in Q2 2024, after a period off the list. In terms of established institutional footprint in Western retail markets, Q-Cells carries the stronger name recognition.

On product positioning, Q-Cells focuses on premium residential and commercial rooftop installations across North America, Europe, and Australia. Its Q.ANTUM NEO line is built on TOPCon cell architecture, reaching efficiencies above 22% and a notably low temperature coefficient that benefits hot-climate installations, and it is backed by a 25-year product warranty. Solarspace's portfolio spans a wider power range suited to both residential and utility-scale ground-mount applications, and the company is actively expanding into HJT-based modules as part of a broader N-type strategy. Its commercial center of gravity, however, remains cell supply to other manufacturers rather than branded end-consumer module sales.

For a typical residential or small commercial buyer in 2025, Q-Cells is the more practical default: it has deeper distributor networks in North America and Europe, a documented third-party review record, and a more predictable warranty-service infrastructure. Solarspace is a credible option for project developers sourcing directly at scale, particularly where cost-per-watt is the primary driver and the buyer is comfortable engaging a brand whose reputation is stronger on the cell side than in branded retail.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-11

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Q-Cells A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Solarspace
Manufacturers
Q-Cells AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Solarspace
Manufacturers
Q-Cells AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Solarspace
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers · See 5 Solarspace offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.