Philadelphia Solar vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 99 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Philadelphia Solar leans bifacial (67% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Philadelphia Solar is a Jordanian Tier 1 solar module and steel mounting structure manufacturer that was established in 2007. It is the first MEA-based company to manufacture, develop, design, construct, own, and operate utility-scale, commercial and industrial photovoltaic plants. The company exports to over 52...
- Founded
- 2007
- Headquarters
- Amman, Jordan
- Annual capacity
- 0.58 GW/year
- Employees
- 51-200
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
- Founded
- 1997
- Headquarters
- Changzhou, China
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+
Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (55%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)
The flagships
Written summary
Philadelphia Solar is a Jordanian manufacturer founded in 2007 and headquartered in Amman - a city known in antiquity as Philadelphia, which explains the brand name. Commercial production began in 2009, making it the first solar module manufacturer to emerge from the Middle East and Africa region. The company exports to more than 52 countries and holds Tier 1 bankability recognition in the PV ModuleTech report, though its institutional footprint remains primarily regional. Trina Solar, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer that has consistently ranked among the top three global module suppliers. With cumulative shipments exceeding 205 GW, annual shipments of roughly 77 GW recorded in 2024, and a 2025 target of 70-75 GW, Trina operates at an entirely different scale. It has appeared on Bloomberg NEF's Tier 1 list for over a decade and topped BNEF's bankability ranking eight times, giving it stronger standing with project-finance lenders worldwide - a clear institutional advantage.
Philadelphia Solar's product portfolio covers monocrystalline PERC and bifacial modules suited to residential rooftops, commercial C&I installations, and utility-scale ground-mounted systems. Its specifications are optimized for hot and arid climates, and the brand holds the Top PV Brand MENA recognition. Trina Solar's flagship Vertex series is built around N-type TOPCon cell technology, with confirmed module efficiencies ranging from 19.2% to 22.5% across the lineup. The Vertex range addresses both residential and large-scale utility applications, and Trina has expanded into energy storage and racking solutions. PVEL has named Trina a Top Performer for eleven consecutive years.
For most international buyers, Trina Solar is the lower-risk default - its supply chain depth, financing track record, and breadth of certified products reduce project risk at every scale. Philadelphia Solar is a credible and well-regarded regional alternative, particularly for buyers operating in the Middle East and Africa or deliberately diversifying away from Chinese supply chains, but it cannot yet match Trina's global institutional weight or manufacturing volume.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-15
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 5 Philadelphia Solar offers · See 242 Trina Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.