Skip to main content

Longi Solar vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Longi Solar
China Founded 2000 Tier 1
Read the Longi Solar review
VS
Trina Solar
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Trina Solar review
At a glance

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 255 models). Longi Solar leads on peak efficiency at 25.00%.

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
255 340
Highest power
670 Wp 760 Wp
Best efficiency
25.0% 24.8%
Average efficiency
22.6% 21.7%
Bifacial share
40% 43%
Average warranty
28 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Longi Solar

LONGi Green Energy Technology Co., Ltd. is a world-leading solar technology company that manufactures monocrystalline silicon wafers and modules. The company is committed to providing high-efficiency and reliable clean energy solutions for large-scale power plants, various industries, and households. LONGi aims to be...

Founded
2000
Headquarters
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
Annual capacity
85-90 GW/year
Employees
37,853
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Trina Solar
Founded
1997
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Longi Solar Trina Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 255 340+85
Max Power 670 W 760 W+90 W
Avg Power 544 W+23 W 520 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 25.00%+0.20 pp 24.80%
Avg Efficiency 22.65%+0.93 pp 21.71%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.291%/°C+0.011 -0.302%/°C
Bifacial Share 101 (40%) 145 (43%)+3 pp
Avg Warranty 27.8 yrs 28.2 yrs+0.4 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Longi Solar skews to higher efficiency: 43% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Longi Solar offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)

Longi Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>N-type</strong> (42%)

Trina Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

LONGi Solar and Trina Solar are both Chinese Tier 1 bankable manufacturers that rank among the top four global PV module suppliers, yet they differ in company history, scale, and strategic technology focus. LONGi was founded in 2000, is listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, and employs 37,853 people with a production capacity of 85-90 GW - making it one of the largest solar manufacturers in the world by installed capacity. In the first half of 2025, LONGi shipped approximately 39.57 GW of modules, ranking second globally. Trina Solar was founded three years earlier, in 1997, and shipped over 32 GW in the same period, securing third place worldwide. Trina has particularly strengthened its European presence, with Europe accounting for roughly 25% of its sales in H1 2025, and the brand reaching the top position in European market popularity in early 2026 - ahead of LONGi, whose European shipments accounted for around 16% of overseas sales in 2024.

The two manufacturers diverge most clearly in their cell technology strategies. LONGi has positioned itself as the leader in back-contact N-type technology, with its Hi-MO X series built on the proprietary HPBC 2.0 platform. This delivers the highest average efficiency in the comparison at 22.65% (max 25%), a superior average temperature coefficient of -0.291%/°C, and an average module power of 543.5 Wp - making LONGi a strong candidate for residential rooftop installations and commercial C&I projects where shading tolerance, efficiency per square meter, and thermal performance are priorities. Trina Solar, by contrast, has committed heavily to TOPCon, with nearly 70% of its 305-panel portfolio based on this technology. Its Vertex series reaches up to 740 Wp - the highest peak wattage in this comparison - and its i-TOPCon cell achieved an independently certified record efficiency of 26.58%. This high unit power output makes Trina a competitive choice for utility-scale ground-mount projects where maximizing energy yield per installation footprint drives procurement decisions. Both manufacturers offer bifacial panels in approximately 39% of their respective portfolios, and average product warranties of 27.8 and 28.1 years respectively.

For international buyers selecting between the two, LONGi is the stronger option for residential and C&I applications where shade tolerance, high per-module efficiency, and favorable temperature coefficients are decisive factors. Trina Solar's broader portfolio, higher peak wattage, and deep TOPCon production scale make it more suited to large utility-scale procurement, and its expanding European distribution network supports reliable supply chains for European and Polish installers alike. Both carry low financial risk given their Tier 1 status, global shipment volumes, and active R&D pipelines pushing next-generation tandem cell technology.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Longi Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Trina Solar
Manufacturers
Longi Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Trina Solar
Manufacturers
Longi Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Trina Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 174 Longi Solar offers · See 248 Trina Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.