Skip to main content

Lina Energy vs Q-Cells - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Lina Energy
United Kingdom Founded 2017
Read the Lina Energy review
VS
Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
At a glance

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 37 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
37 89
Highest power
550 Wp 675 Wp
Best efficiency
22.4% 23.2%
Average efficiency
20.3% 21.2%
Bifacial share
19% 39%
Average warranty
28 yrs 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Lina Energy

LiNa Energy is a technology company specializing in the development and provision of low-cost, high-performance, and safe sodium batteries. The company focuses on renewable energy storage solutions, offering a safer and more sustainable alternative to lithium-ion batteries. Their solid-state sodium battery technology...

Founded
2017
Headquarters
Lancaster, United Kingdom
Employees
28
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Lina Energy Q-Cells
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 37 89+52
Max Power 550 W 675 W+125 W
Avg Power 402 W 468 W+66 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 22.37% 23.20%+0.83 pp
Avg Efficiency 20.32% 21.21%+0.90 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.352%/°C -0.325%/°C+0.028
Bifacial Share 7 (19%) 35 (39%)+20 pp
Avg Warranty 28.4 yrs+1.4 yr 27.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)

Lina Energy cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (30%)

Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Lina Energy is a solar manufacturer headquartered in Bulgaria, founded in 2016, with additional offices in Jordan and China. It operates at a regional scale and does not appear on BloombergNEF Tier 1 or S&P Global bankability lists, positioning it as a niche rather than globally bankable brand. Q-Cells, now branded as Hanwha Q CELLS after its 2012 acquisition by South Korea's Hanwha Group, traces its roots to Germany in 1999 and has since become one of the world's largest module producers, with combined global manufacturing capacity of approximately 12 GW per year. Q-Cells holds a BloombergNEF Top Tier bankability score, earned S&P Global Tier 1 Cleantech status in 2025, and secured a $1.45 billion DOE loan guarantee for its US factories in Georgia - indicators of an institutional footprint that Lina Energy cannot yet match.

Lina Energy's catalog covers residential and light commercial applications with monocrystalline and polycrystalline panels in the 280 W-550 W range, and the company has introduced TOPCon cell technology in part of its lineup, making it a reasonable budget option for buyers in southeastern Europe and the Middle East where the brand is most active. Q-Cells centers its offer on premium residential rooftops and distributed commercial installations through the Q.TRON and Q.PEAK series, which rely on the company's proprietary Q.ANTUM passivated-contact cell design. Top models in the Q.TRON M-G2+ range reach efficiencies up to 23.7%, paired with a 25-year product warranty and a verified annual degradation rate of around 0.33%, making them well suited for buyers prioritizing long-term yield and bankable documentation.

For most buyers in 2025, Q-Cells is the stronger default. Its bankability credentials simplify project financing, its US domestic manufacturing reduces supply-chain exposure for North American installations, and its independently documented degradation performance lowers long-term yield risk. Lina Energy suits cost-sensitive or regionally focused projects where its installer network is established, but its absence from global Tier 1 lists makes it a difficult choice for any financed or utility-adjacent deployment. The two brands are not interchangeable at scale.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-02

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Lina Energy A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Q-Cells
Manufacturers
Lina Energy AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Q-Cells
Manufacturers
Lina Energy AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Q-Cells
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.