Skip to main content

Lina Energy vs AKCOME - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Lina Energy
United Kingdom Founded 2017
Read the Lina Energy review
VS
AKCOME
China Founded 2003
Read the AKCOME review
At a glance

Lina Energy has the broader catalog (37 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
37 3
Highest power
550 Wp 700 Wp
Best efficiency
22.4% 22.5%
Average efficiency
20.3% 21.6%
Bifacial share
19% 100%
Average warranty
28 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Lina Energy

LiNa Energy is a technology company specializing in the development and provision of low-cost, high-performance, and safe sodium batteries. The company focuses on renewable energy storage solutions, offering a safer and more sustainable alternative to lithium-ion batteries. Their solid-state sodium battery technology...

Founded
2017
Headquarters
Lancaster, United Kingdom
Employees
28
AKCOME
Founded
2003
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Lina Energy AKCOME
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 37+34 3
Max Power 550 W 700 W+150 W
Avg Power 402 W 672 W+270 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 22.37% 22.54%+0.17 pp
Avg Efficiency 20.32% 21.63%+1.31 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.352%/°C -0.240%/°C+0.112
Bifacial Share 7 (19%) 3 (100%)+81 pp
Avg Warranty 28.4 yrs 30.0 yrs+1.6 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band
Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)

Lina Energy cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (30%)

AKCOME cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

AKCOME is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Jiangsu province that built a significant presence in PV modules and mounting systems through the early 2020s, with reported annual module production capacity of around 3.8 GW. The company previously held BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability recognition, but its institutional standing collapsed in 2024: after reporting cumulative net losses of roughly CNY 2.1 billion over three years, a subsidiary entered court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization in July 2024, and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange delisted AKCOME's shares in August 2024. Lina Energy, by contrast, is a smaller company founded in 2016 and headquartered in Bulgaria, with offices in the UK, Canada, Jordan, and China. No confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 status has been documented for Lina Energy in publicly available sources, and its production scale is a fraction of AKCOME's former output - but AKCOME's current operational viability is in serious doubt, which heavily qualifies that comparison. On institutional footprint as of mid-2025, neither brand commands a leading position, and AKCOME's former standing has been effectively forfeited.

In terms of product families, AKCOME historically served residential rooftops and commercial or utility ground-mount applications alongside a racking systems business, with efficiency ratings reaching around 22.5% on its strongest models. Lina Energy offers a mixed catalog that third-party review aggregators document as including TOPCon and BIPV variants alongside conventional monocrystalline options, with average module efficiency around 20.3% and a 28-year performance warranty on most products. The company appears to target residential and light-commercial buyers across its international branch network.

For a typical buyer evaluating these two brands, Lina Energy is the more defensible choice by default - not because of outstanding performance credentials, but because AKCOME's corporate structure is effectively non-functional following delisting and bankruptcy proceedings. Any buyer encountering AKCOME inventory should verify the supply chain carefully and confirm whether warranty obligations remain backed by a solvent entity. Lina Energy, while a smaller and less independently benchmarked brand, appears to be an operational company actively warranting its products.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-25

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Lina Energy A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
Lina Energy AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO AKCOME
Manufacturers
Lina Energy ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM AKCOME
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.