Skip to main content

Kyocera vs AIKO - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Kyocera
Japan Founded 1959
Read the Kyocera review
VS
AIKO
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the AIKO review
At a glance

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 8 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
8 144
Highest power
410 Wp 805 Wp
Best efficiency
21.0% 25.2%
Average efficiency
18.2% 23.7%
Bifacial share
0% 24%
Average warranty
25 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Kyocera

Kyocera Corporation is a Japanese multinational electronics and ceramics manufacturer. Founded in 1959, the company produces a diverse range of products, including industrial ceramics, solar power generating systems, telecommunications equipment, and office document imaging equipment. Kyocera is committed to...

Founded
1959
Headquarters
Kyoto, Japan
Employees
77,136
Listed
TYO: 6971
AIKO
Founded
2009
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Kyocera AIKO
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 8 144+136
Max Power 410 W 805 W+395 W
Avg Power 302 W 581 W+280 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 21.00% 25.20%+4.20 pp
Avg Efficiency 18.21% 23.65%+5.44 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.460%/°C -0.271%/°C+0.189
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 35 (24%)+24 pp
Avg Warranty 25.0 yrs 29.5 yrs+4.5 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)

Kyocera cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
AIKO cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Kyocera is a Japanese conglomerate headquartered in Kyoto, founded in 1959, with a solar division that began manufacturing photovoltaic modules as far back as 1975 - making it one of the earliest commercial solar panel producers in the world. The company retains a strong institutional presence in Japan and parts of Asia, but it withdrew from North American sales in 2016 and has not appeared on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 module manufacturer lists in recent years, reflecting its reduced role in the global volume market. Its current commercial footprint is concentrated in Japan, where it continues to develop products, including a 410 W snow-load-resistant module launched in early 2025. AIKO, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Guangdong, founded around 2009, that has achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and has been rapidly scaling production capacity across multiple gigawatt-scale facilities in China. In terms of global institutional recognition and bankability in 2025, AIKO holds the stronger position.

Kyocera's current Japanese-market panels use monocrystalline technology with efficiencies reported at over 22%, a meaningful step up from the polycrystalline products the company was known for historically. The product focus is largely residential and light commercial in Japan, with a heritage warranty stance and niche snow-country durability products. AIKO has built its identity around ABC (All Back Contact) n-type cell technology, placing both contacts on the rear of the cell to minimize shading losses. A module using this technology achieved a world-record efficiency of 25.2% at Intersolar 2024 according to PV Magazine. AIKO targets premium residential rooftops and is expanding toward utility-scale ground-mount markets globally, and it took first place in the 2025 SolarQuotes Installers' Choice Awards in Australia.

For most buyers outside Japan in 2025, AIKO is the more practical default: it is bankable by BloombergNEF standards, widely available internationally, built on a leading cell technology, and backed by verifiable installer feedback. Kyocera remains a credible choice for buyers in Japan who value the company's long operational track record and domestic service network, but it is essentially absent from competitive global procurement.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-16

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Kyocera A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar AIKO
Manufacturers
Kyocera AEET
Manufacturers
AKCOME AIKO
Manufacturers
Kyocera ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM AIKO
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 179 AIKO offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.