Skip to main content

Jinko Solar vs KIOTO Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
VS
KIOTO Solar
Austria Founded 1991
Read the KIOTO Solar review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 7 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. KIOTO Solar leans bifacial (57% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
637 7
Highest power
735 Wp 450 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 22.8%
Average efficiency
22.2% 22.5%
Bifacial share
36% 57%
Average warranty
29 yrs 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
KIOTO Solar

KIOTO Solar (KIOTO Photovoltaics GmbH) is an Austrian manufacturer of photovoltaic modules, producing panels exclusively at its facility in St. Veit an der Glan, Carinthia. The company traces its roots to 1991 as part of the Sonnenkraft group, with PV module production beginning in 2005. It is the market leader for PV...

Founded
1991
Headquarters
St. Veit an der Glan, Austria
Annual capacity
<1 GW/year
Employees
201-500
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jinko Solar KIOTO Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 637+630 7
Max Power 735 W+285 W 450 W
Avg Power 523 W+77 W 446 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+1.97 pp 22.83%
Avg Efficiency 22.18% 22.53%+0.36 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C+0.004 -0.309%/°C
Bifacial Share 231 (36%) 4 (57%)+21 pp
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs+1.6 yr 27.1 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

KIOTO Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (100%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, is the world's largest solar panel manufacturer by shipment volume, with an annual production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,000 employees. Listed on the NYSE and holding Tier 1 bankable status, the company commands approximately 20% of the European market and has earned PVEL Top Performer recognition for eleven consecutive years, underscoring a long track record of reliability. KIOTO Solar, by contrast, is a boutique Austrian manufacturer established in 1991 and operating under the Sonnenkraft group umbrella. With a production capacity below 1 GW and a team of 201-500 employees, KIOTO does not carry Tier 1 status but differentiates itself through fully European manufacturing, short supply chains, and strong alignment with EU quality and carbon standards.

Both manufacturers have adopted TOPCon cell technology, though their portfolios differ significantly in breadth. Jinko deploys TOPCon across roughly 39% of a 545-model lineup that reaches up to 735 Wp, while KIOTO has gone all-in on TOPCon across its compact seven-model range capped at 450 Wp. Average panel efficiency is comparable at 22.0% for Jinko and 22.5% for KIOTO, but bifacial share diverges sharply: KIOTO dedicates 57% of its portfolio to bifacial modules versus Jinko's 32%. Jinko's scale, Tier 1 rating, and average product warranty of over 28 years make it the dominant choice for utility-scale ground-mount projects and large commercial C&I installations where bankability and competitive per-watt pricing are decisive. KIOTO's narrower but fully TOPCon bifacial-oriented lineup, combined with its European provenance, suits residential rooftop installs and small-to-mid commercial projects where buyers value local after-sales support and reduced geopolitical supply risk.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision comes down to project scale and procurement priorities. Jinko Solar is the lower-risk, higher-volume choice for utility developers and EPC contractors who need bankable modules, proven logistics, and a globally competitive price point. KIOTO Solar is the more defensible option for European buyers prioritizing "Made in EU" credentials, a fully TOPCon and bifacial-heavy portfolio in smaller quantities, and closer supplier relationships - though the absence of Tier 1 status may complicate project financing in certain markets.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar KIOTO Solar
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO KIOTO Solar
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar KIOTO Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 160 Jinko Solar offers · See 2 KIOTO Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.