Skip to main content

Isola New Energy vs Jinko Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Isola New Energy
China Founded 2006
Read the Isola New Energy review
VS
Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 55 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
55 637
Highest power
720 Wp 735 Wp
Best efficiency
23.3% 24.8%
Average efficiency
19.8% 22.2%
Bifacial share
16% 36%
Average warranty
29 yrs 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Isola New Energy

Zhejiang Isola New Energy Co., Ltd. is a tech-oriented enterprise involved in R&D, production, and installation of solar products including solar cells, solar panels, solar street lighting and on/off-grid solar systems. The company has a strong supplier network and operates three factories in Ningbo and Shandong...

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China
Annual capacity
3 GW/year
Employees
101 - 500
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Isola New Energy Jinko Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 55 637+582
Max Power 720 W 735 W+15 W
Avg Power 333 W 523 W+189 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.27% 24.80%+1.53 pp
Avg Efficiency 19.82% 22.18%+2.36 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.341%/°C -0.304%/°C+0.036
Bifacial Share 9 (16%) 231 (36%)+20 pp
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs 28.7 yrs+0.0 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)

Isola New Energy cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Flexible</strong> (29%)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Isola New Energy and Jinko Solar are both Chinese solar panel manufacturers founded in the same year, 2006, yet they occupy entirely different tiers of the global PV market. Jinko Solar is the world's leading module supplier, with a declared production capacity of 130 GW, a workforce of over 33,800 employees, NYSE listing, and confirmed Tier 1 bankable status - it shipped more than 100 GW of panels in 2025 alone and holds approximately 13% of global market share. Isola New Energy, by contrast, is a much smaller regional player with a production capacity of 3 GW and 101-500 employees; it carries no Tier 1 certification and is not publicly traded. Jinko's portfolio spans 545 panel models versus Isola's 55, giving Jinko far greater flexibility across project types and power classes.

On the technology side, Jinko's lead is clear: its dominant cell technology is TOPCon, which accounts for roughly 39% of its catalog, with maximum module efficiency reaching 24.8% and an average of 22.0%. Its temperature coefficient for Pmax averages -0.308%/°C, meaning panels retain more output during hot summer months - an increasingly relevant factor in warm European climates. Isola's top cell technology is unspecified, its average efficiency sits at 19.8% with a maximum of 23.27%, and its temperature coefficient of -0.336%/°C is less favorable. One area where Isola edges ahead is warranty length, averaging 30 years versus Jinko's 28.5 years. Isola's average panel power of 333 Wp makes it better suited for smaller residential rooftop installs, while Jinko's average of 511 Wp - combined with a 32% bifacial share in its portfolio - positions it strongly for utility-scale ground-mount and commercial C&I projects. Jinko's 11 consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer further underline its manufacturing consistency.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the lower-risk, higher-performance option for virtually any project type requiring bankable equipment, insurance approval, or long-term yield modeling. Isola New Energy may serve a role in off-grid applications or price-sensitive markets where Tier 1 certification and financing requirements are not mandatory, but its limited portfolio depth, unverified cell technology dominance, and marginal market presence make it a niche rather than mainstream choice when set against Jinko's scale and track record.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Isola New Energy A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Jinko Solar
Manufacturers
Isola New Energy AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Jinko Solar
Manufacturers
Isola New Energy AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Jinko Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 2 Isola New Energy offers · See 173 Jinko Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.