Skip to main content

GL Solar vs Q-Cells - solar panel manufacturer comparison

GL Solar
Italy Founded 2000
Read the GL Solar review
VS
Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
At a glance

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 13 models). GL Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.60%. GL Solar leans bifacial (100% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
13 89
Highest power
640 Wp 675 Wp
Best efficiency
23.6% 23.2%
Average efficiency
22.6% 21.2%
Bifacial share
100% 39%
Average warranty
30 yrs 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
GL Solar

GL Solar Energy s.r.l. is a small Italian company based in Marcianise (Caserta) specializing in the design, production, and installation of photovoltaic systems for residential and industrial applications. The company also distributes solar panels and related equipment, working with major international brands such as...

Founded
2000
Headquarters
Marcianise, Italy
Employees
1-10
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric GL Solar Q-Cells
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 13 89+76
Max Power 640 W 675 W+35 W
Avg Power 603 W+135 W 468 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.60%+0.40 pp 23.20%
Avg Efficiency 22.61%+1.39 pp 21.21%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.274%/°C+0.051 -0.325%/°C
Bifacial Share 13 (100%)+61 pp 35 (39%)
Avg Warranty 30.0 yrs+3.0 yr 27.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

GL Solar skews to higher efficiency: 38% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

GL Solar offers more 600W+ panels (77% of lineup)

GL Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (54%)

Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

GL Solar is a small Italian trading company headquartered in Villafranca di Verona that operates primarily as a distributor and rebrander of solar modules rather than as a vertically integrated manufacturer. Panels sold under its name have been sourced from third-party Chinese producers, including units traceable to Austa Energy and Aiko. Because GL Solar does not appear on any BloombergNEF Tier 1 list and has no publicly reported gigawatt-scale production capacity of its own, its bankability for large financed projects is limited. Q-Cells - operating under the full corporate name Hanwha Q CELLS - traces its origins to a German company founded in 1999 that was acquired by South Korean conglomerate Hanwha Group in 2012. Today it holds a confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, was named an S&P Global Tier 1 clean-technology company for 2025, and operates a US manufacturing hub in Cartersville and Dalton, Georgia, with domestic module capacity reported at over 8 GW. Q-Cells has a significantly stronger institutional footprint at every scale.

On the product side, GL Solar's catalog consists of rebranded commodity modules that can appeal to price-sensitive buyers willing to accept less transparency about the underlying supply chain. Hanwha Q CELLS, by contrast, ships two clearly defined proprietary families: the Q.PEAK DUO line, which uses PERC cell technology and targets cost-conscious residential and commercial buyers, and the Q.TRON series, which is built on N-type TOPCon cells, delivers efficiency ratings confirmed up to around 22.5 percent, and carries an industry-leading 25-year product warranty that covers labor costs on top of materials.

For most buyers in 2025, Q-Cells is the stronger default choice by a wide margin. Its domestic US manufacturing makes it eligible for Inflation Reduction Act incentives, its warranty is clearly enforceable against a major corporation, and its Tier 1 bankability simplifies project financing. GL Solar may suit only buyers where upfront cost is the sole criterion and they have independently verified the credentials of the underlying source manufacturer.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-10

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
GL Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Q-Cells
Manufacturers
GL Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Q-Cells
Manufacturers
GL Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Q-Cells
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 2 GL Solar offers · See 24 Q-Cells offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.