Skip to main content

Gintech vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Gintech
Taiwan Founded 2005
Read the Gintech review
VS
Trina Solar
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Trina Solar review
At a glance

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 7 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
7 340
Highest power
365 Wp 760 Wp
Best efficiency
18.8% 24.8%
Average efficiency
16.6% 21.7%
Bifacial share
0% 43%
Average warranty
25 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Gintech

Gintech Energy Corporation was a Taiwanese manufacturer of crystalline silicon solar cells and modules, founded in 2005 and headquartered in Zhunan, Hsinchu Science Park. The company produced mono- and multi-crystalline solar cells under its Diamond, Douro, and Phoenix product lines. In January 2018, Gintech merged...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Zhunan (Hsinchu Science Park), Taiwan
Employees
1000-2000
Trina Solar
Founded
1997
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Gintech Trina Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 7 340+333
Max Power 365 W 760 W+395 W
Avg Power 281 W 520 W+239 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 18.80% 24.80%+6.00 pp
Avg Efficiency 16.61% 21.71%+5.10 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.416%/°C -0.302%/°C+0.114
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 145 (43%)+43 pp
Avg Warranty 25.0 yrs 28.2 yrs+3.2 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)

Gintech cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (29%)

Trina Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Gintech Energy Corporation was a Taiwanese solar cell manufacturer founded in August 2005 and headquartered in Hsinchu, Taiwan. From the outset the company operated as a B2B cell supplier, delivering crystalline silicon cells to module manufacturers rather than selling finished panels to installers or end-users. In October 2018, Gintech merged with Neo Solar Power and Solartech Energy to form United Renewable Energy Co., Ltd. (URECO), ending Gintech's independent existence as a brand. The combined entity carried a total cell production capacity of approximately 4.5 GW. Trina Solar, by contrast, was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu, China. It has maintained continuous Tier 1 status from BloombergNEF for many years and is the only PV manufacturer to have achieved 100% bankability on the BNEF survey eight times. Module production capacity is forecast to approach 95 GW by end of 2025. In terms of institutional footprint, global distribution, and ongoing market presence, Trina Solar is substantially the stronger of the two.

During its independent years, Gintech's product lines - Diamond, Douro, and Phoenix - were crystalline silicon cells sold upstream in the supply chain, meaning the brand had limited direct visibility at the project or installer level. Trina Solar's current Vertex family covers every major market segment: the Vertex N i-TOPCon Ultra lineup includes a 760 W module for utility-scale ground-mount projects, a 670 W format for commercial and industrial rooftops, and a 495 W panel for residential installations. TOPCon is confirmed as the dominant cell technology across Trina's current portfolio, with mass-production efficiency reaching 24.5% on flagship utility modules. Trina has also earned eleven consecutive years of recognition as a PVEL Top Performer, providing meaningful comfort for project lenders and long-term asset owners.

For buyers evaluating these two brand names today, the comparison is effectively asymmetric. Gintech no longer exists as an independent manufacturer, its assets and intellectual property having been absorbed into URECO in 2018. Trina Solar remains one of the most bankable and widely specified solar brands in the world, backed by a 30-year linear performance warranty on flagship models. Unless a procurement process specifically calls for URECO-branded products (the direct corporate successor to Gintech), Trina Solar is the clear default choice for new installations across residential, commercial, and utility segments.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-22

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Gintech A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Trina Solar
Manufacturers
Gintech AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Trina Solar
Manufacturers
Gintech AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Trina Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 249 Trina Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.