ENCOR vs Hyundai - Solar Panel Manufacturer Comparison
ENCOR
Poland · est. 1991Hyundai
South Korea · est. 2004
Panel models
0
vs
65
Max power
0 W
vs
640 W
Max efficiency
-
vs
23.40%
Bifacial share
0%
vs
66%
At a glance
Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 0 models). Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).
ENCOR
Website
ENCOR is a proprietary solar brand owned by CORAB S.A., a Polish manufacturer and distributor of photovoltaic systems founded in 1991. The brand covers an ecosystem of own-label PV modules, inverters, and energy storage units produced to CORAB's specifications. CORAB is one of the largest photovoltaic mounting...
Headquarters
Olsztyn, Poland
Founded
1991
Employees
200,500
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
-
Stock
-
Hyundai
Website
HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...
Headquarters
Seongnam-si, South Korea
Founded
2004
Employees
206
Production Capacity
1.35 GW/year
Tier 1 Bankable
Yes
Side-by-Side Specs
winner + margin shown| Metric |
ENCOR
|
Hyundai
|
|---|---|---|
| Catalog & Power | ||
| Panel Models | 0 | 65 +65 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 640 W +640 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 442 W +442 W |
| Efficiency | ||
| Max Efficiency | - | 23.40% |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.49% |
| Reliability & Warranty | ||
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.300%/°C |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 43 (66%) +66 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 27.4 yrs |
Top Panels Side-by-Side
Top 10 highest-power models from each brandENCOR
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No panel data available. | |||||
Hyundai
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HiS-T640NJ Bi | 640W | 22.9% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | HiS-T635NJ Bi | 635W | 22.7% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | HiS-T630NJ Bi | 630W | 22.5% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) Bi | 520W | 23.4% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB) Bi | 515W | 23.2% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB) Bi | 510W | 22.9% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB) Bi | 505W | 22.7% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB) Bi | 500W | 22.5% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) Bi | 460W | 23.0% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | HiT-H460CE-BF Bi | 460W | 23.0% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
Top 0 panels average
Efficiency
-
Temp coeff
-
Top 10 panels average
Efficiency
22.89%
Temp coeff
-0.255%/°C
Efficiency Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by efficiency tier
Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+
Power Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by rated power range
Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup)
ENCOR Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Hyundai Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: HJT (38%)
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on our database and may not reflect complete product lineups. Help the community by suggesting missing panels.