Skip to main content

DAS Solar vs JA Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

DAS Solar
China Founded 2018 Tier 1
Read the DAS Solar review
VS
JA Solar
China Founded 2005 Tier 1
Read the JA Solar review
At a glance

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 97 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. DAS Solar leans bifacial (75% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
97 504
Highest power
715 Wp 740 Wp
Best efficiency
24.1% 24.8%
Average efficiency
22.0% 21.1%
Bifacial share
75% 47%
Average warranty
29 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
DAS Solar

DAS Solar, founded in 2018, specializes in the development, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency solar cells and photovoltaic modules. The company is committed to providing integrated PV new energy system solutions. DAS Solar is recognized as a global high-tech enterprise and a leader in N-type photovoltaic...

Founded
2018
Headquarters
Quzhou, Zhejiang, China
Annual capacity
40-50 GW/year
Employees
500+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
JA Solar

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Beijing, China
Annual capacity
100+ GW/year
Employees
37,289
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric DAS Solar JA Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 97 504+407
Max Power 715 W 740 W+25 W
Avg Power 528 W+71 W 456 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.10% 24.80%+0.70 pp
Avg Efficiency 21.95%+0.82 pp 21.13%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C+0.018 -0.322%/°C
Bifacial Share 73 (75%)+28 pp 238 (47%)
Avg Warranty 29.1 yrs+1.2 yr 27.9 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

DAS Solar offers more 600W+ panels (24% of lineup)

DAS Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (76%)

JA Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

DAS Solar is a relatively young manufacturer founded in 2018 in Quzhou, Zhejiang, China, with a workforce of 500+ employees and an estimated production capacity of 40-50 GW. Despite its recent founding, the company has achieved Tier 1 bankable status, signaling financial credibility with lenders and project investors. Its portfolio of 88 models is firmly oriented toward modern n-type technology, with TOPCon accounting for 50% of its lineup. This focus yields an average module efficiency of 21.9%, a maximum of 24.1%, and a favorable average temperature coefficient of -0.306%/°C - all meaningfully better than its rival on these metrics. JA Solar, by contrast, is a seasoned industry heavyweight founded in 2005, publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE), and employing nearly 37,300 people worldwide. With a production capacity exceeding 100 GW, JA Solar consistently ranks among the top two global module suppliers by shipment volume and has maintained Tier 1 bankable status for many years. Its extensive catalog of 524 models covers a broad power range, reaching a maximum of 740 Wp per module, though its portfolio still leans on PERC technology (52% of models) alongside a growing TOPCon offering.

DAS Solar's standout characteristic is its very high share of bifacial modules at 72.7% of its portfolio, making it a compelling option for ground-mount installations - whether residential prosumer systems or commercial C&I projects - where albedo gains can meaningfully boost energy yield. Its higher average module power (532 Wp) and longer average warranty (approximately 29 years) also suit rooftop installations on industrial and logistics buildings where roof space is limited. JA Solar's breadth of portfolio and global distribution network make it equally at home in small residential rooftop installs, mid-scale commercial C&I projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount farms. Its well-established presence across European markets, including strong distributor networks, provides installers with reliable parts availability and after-sales support.

For buyers choosing between the two, DAS Solar is the stronger pick when TOPCon cell technology, a high bifacial ratio, and a tighter, more modern product lineup are the priority - particularly for ground-mount and C&I applications. JA Solar is the lower-risk choice for installers and developers who need the flexibility of a vast model catalog, the reassurance of a long-established brand, and robust financing eligibility on utility-scale projects where lender familiarity with the manufacturer matters.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
DAS Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar JA Solar
Manufacturers
DAS Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO JA Solar
Manufacturers
DAS Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar JA Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 4 DAS Solar offers · See 386 JA Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.