Clelo Tech vs Hyundai - Solar Panel Manufacturer Comparison
Clelo Tech
China · est. 2017Hyundai
South Korea · est. 2004
Panel models
7
vs
65
Max power
720 W
vs
640 W
Max efficiency
23.20%
vs
23.40%
Bifacial share
100%
vs
66%
At a glance
Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 7 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. Clelo Tech leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Clelo Tech
Website
Jiangsu Clelo Material Technologies Co., Ltd. is a Chinese solar manufacturer and system integrator based in Changshu, Suzhou, specializing in photovoltaic panels, BIPV technology, and complete PV power plant solutions. The company offers products and turnkey systems ranging from small residential installations to...
Headquarters
Changshu, China
Founded
2017
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
-
Stock
-
Hyundai
Website
HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...
Headquarters
Seongnam-si, South Korea
Founded
2004
Employees
206
Production Capacity
1.35 GW/year
Tier 1 Bankable
Yes
Side-by-Side Specs
winner + margin shown| Metric |
Clelo Tech
|
Hyundai
|
|---|---|---|
| Catalog & Power | ||
| Panel Models | 7 | 65 +58 |
| Max Power | 720 W +80 W | 640 W |
| Avg Power | 705 W +263 W | 442 W |
| Efficiency | ||
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | 23.40% +0.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.70% +1.21 pp | 21.49% |
| Reliability & Warranty | ||
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C +0.060 | -0.300%/°C |
| Bifacial Share | 7 (100%) +34 pp | 43 (66%) |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs +2.6 yr | 27.4 yrs |
Top Panels Side-by-Side
Top 10 highest-power models from each brandClelo Tech
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JT720SLkB Bi | 720W | 23.2% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | JT715SLkB Bi | 715W | 23.0% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | JT710SLkB Bi | 710W | 22.9% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | JT705SLkB Bi | 705W | 22.7% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | JT700SLkB Bi | 700W | 22.5% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | JT695SLkB Bi | 695W | 22.4% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | JT690SLkB Bi | 690W | 22.2% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
Hyundai
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HiS-T640NJ Bi | 640W | 22.9% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | HiS-T635NJ Bi | 635W | 22.7% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | HiS-T630NJ Bi | 630W | 22.5% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) Bi | 520W | 23.4% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB) Bi | 515W | 23.2% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB) Bi | 510W | 22.9% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB) Bi | 505W | 22.7% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB) Bi | 500W | 22.5% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB) Bi | 460W | 23.0% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | HiT-H460CE-BF Bi | 460W | 23.0% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
Top 7 panels average
Efficiency
22.70%
Temp coeff
-0.240%/°C
Top 10 panels average
Efficiency
22.89%
Temp coeff
-0.255%/°C
Efficiency Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by efficiency tier
Clelo Tech skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+
Power Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by rated power range
Clelo Tech offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Clelo Tech Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: HJT (100%)
Hyundai Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: HJT (38%)
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on our database and may not reflect complete product lineups. Help the community by suggesting missing panels.