AKCOME vs VDS Renewable - solar panel manufacturer comparison
VDS Renewable has the broader catalog (63 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (32%)
The flagships
Written summary
AKCOME, formally Zhejiang Akcome New Energy Technology Co., Ltd., is a Chinese solar manufacturer based in Zhejiang province. Founded in 2009, the company scaled up cell and module production to a reported capacity of around 3.8 GW per year and held BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status for a period. Its institutional standing has since collapsed: the company posted net losses every year from 2019, a subsidiary was ordered into court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization in mid-2024, and AKCOME was delisted from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange later that year after shares fell below the minimum threshold. VDS Renewable, formally Jiangsu VDS Renewable Technology Co., Ltd., is headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu province, and reports 5 GW of solar cell production capacity and 2 GW of module capacity. It holds CE, TUV, and IEC certifications and does not appear on current BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists, though its manufacturing base remains operational - giving it the stronger institutional footing of the two.
Where AKCOME's production has continued, the focus is on high-wattage bifacial panels in the 655 W to 700 W range, with average module efficiency reported at around 21.6% and top models reaching 22.5%. The company markets a 30-year performance warranty, though warranty continuity is genuinely uncertain given the ongoing bankruptcy proceedings. VDS Renewable spans a broader range from roughly 325 W to 670 W, targeting residential rooftops through to commercial and utility-scale ground mounts. Average module efficiency sits at approximately 20.3%, positioning the brand as a mid-tier competitive option. Around 16% of the VDS Renewable catalog is bifacial, suggesting its product mix skews toward conventional single-face modules for cost-sensitive buyers.
For a buyer evaluating these two brands in 2025, VDS Renewable is the more prudent default. AKCOME's active bankruptcy proceedings and stock delisting create serious warranty and after-sales risk that outweigh any product specification advantage. VDS Renewable is not among the recognized global leaders, but its production infrastructure is intact and its certifications current, making it the less risky choice for buyers who need reliable long-term warranty coverage.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-07-07
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.