Skip to main content

AKCOME vs Ulica Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AKCOME
China Founded 2003
Read the AKCOME review
VS
Ulica Solar
China Founded 2014
Read the Ulica Solar review
At a glance

Ulica Solar has the broader catalog (76 vs 3 models). Ulica Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.88%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
3 76
Highest power
700 Wp 715 Wp
Best efficiency
22.5% 23.9%
Average efficiency
21.6% 22.3%
Bifacial share
100% 58%
Average warranty
30 yrs 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
AKCOME
Founded
2003
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
Ulica Solar
Founded
2014
Headquarters
Jiaxing, China
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric AKCOME Ulica Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 3 76+73
Max Power 700 W 715 W+15 W
Avg Power 672 W+108 W 564 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 22.54% 23.88%+1.34 pp
Avg Efficiency 21.63% 22.26%+0.64 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.240%/°C+0.063 -0.303%/°C
Bifacial Share 3 (100%)+42 pp 44 (58%)
Avg Warranty 30.0 yrs+0.7 yr 29.3 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Ulica Solar skews to higher efficiency: 14% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)

AKCOME cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)

Ulica Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (95%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

AKCOME (officially Zhejiang Akcome New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.) is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Zhejiang province that, at its peak, reported annual module production capacity of around 3.8 GW and held a position on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 list through early 2024. However, the company's financial position deteriorated sharply amid China's solar oversupply crisis: a key subsidiary entered court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization in July 2024, and AKCOME's stock was delisted from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in August 2024 after shares fell below 1 yuan for 20 consecutive trading days. Ulica Solar (Ningbo Ulica Solar Science and Technology Co., Ltd.), also a Chinese manufacturer, was founded in 2005 and is headquartered in Ningbo, Zhejiang, with joint backing from Japanese trading house ITOCHU and Shanshan Group. Ulica has appeared continuously on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list since Q1 2020 and has reported module capacity growing into the multi-gigawatt range. On institutional footprint and current operational stability, Ulica Solar holds a clear and significant advantage.

Ulica Solar's commercial lineup centers on monocrystalline PERC half-cut modules spanning a wide wattage range, from compact residential formats to large-format utility panels. Its N-type monocrystalline cell technology has been recognized under China's National Torch Program, and the company holds 17 patents. Standard warranty terms include 12 years of product guarantee and 25 years of power output performance guarantee. AKCOME previously offered both PERC and HJT cell technologies and addressed residential and commercial segments, but its ongoing restructuring introduces genuine uncertainty around warranty continuity and future product supply.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Ulica Solar is the more defensible default. Its uninterrupted Tier 1 bankability status, backing from established corporate shareholders, and continued operations make it a lower-risk choice for any project where warranty fulfillment matters. AKCOME panels may still surface on the secondary market at attractive price points, but the company's unresolved bankruptcy proceedings represent a material risk that most installers and project lenders would be unwilling to absorb without significant additional due diligence.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-25

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
AKCOME A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Ulica Solar
Manufacturers
AKCOME AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Ulica Solar
Manufacturers
AKCOME ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM Ulica Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers · See 8 Ulica Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.