AE Solar vs Ulica Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 76 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%.
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and...
- Founded
- 2003
- Headquarters
- Gersthofen, Germany
- Annual capacity
- 2+ GW/year
- Employees
- 501-1000
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Ulica Solar skews to higher efficiency: 14% of lineup is 23%+
Ulica Solar offers more 600W+ panels (43% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (54%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (95%)
The flagships
Written summary
AE Solar was founded in 2003 in Germany and has grown into one of Europe's most established photovoltaic module brands, with a production capacity exceeding 2 GW across manufacturing facilities in China, Georgia, and Turkey. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status confirmed by Bloomberg NEF, which in 2024 ranked it as Europe's sole Tier 1 PV manufacturer with high bankability - a distinction further supported by its first-of-kind DIBt certification. With a portfolio spanning 442 panel models and a presence in over 95 countries, AE Solar operates at a scale and market reach that clearly differentiates it from Ulica Solar. Ulica Solar, established in 2014 and headquartered in Ningbo, China, is a more focused player backed by the Shanshan Group. It does not carry Tier 1 bankable status in the evaluated dataset, and its 76-model portfolio reflects a more targeted market approach concentrated almost entirely on TOPCon technology.
Both manufacturers have made TOPCon the cornerstone of their technology strategy, but with different portfolio compositions. Ulica Solar's lineup is nearly 95% TOPCon, compared to roughly 50% for AE Solar, which also covers other cell technologies. Ulica Solar achieves a higher average module power (approximately 564 Wp versus 497 Wp) and higher average efficiency (22.26% versus 21.34%), while AE Solar leads on peak values - maximum efficiency of 24.43% versus 23.88%, and maximum module power of 730 Wp versus 715 Wp. AE Solar's bifacial share (63.8% versus 57.9%) and broad portfolio make it a natural fit for utility-scale ground-mount and commercial C&I projects. Ulica Solar's slightly more favorable temperature coefficient (-0.303%/°C versus -0.313%/°C) and high average module power give it an edge for space-constrained residential rooftop installs where energy density is the primary concern.
For international buyers where project bankability, financing eligibility, and product range breadth are priorities - particularly for utility-scale or C&I projects subject to lender due diligence - AE Solar holds a clear advantage. Ulica Solar is a compelling option for buyers focused on high average power output within a tightly standardized TOPCon lineup, and may appeal to residential or smaller commercial installers seeking strong performance metrics, provided Tier 1 bankability is not a hard requirement for the project.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers · See 8 Ulica Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.