AKCOME vs Sunket New Energy - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Sunket New Energy has the broader catalog (55 vs 3 models). Sunket New Energy leads on peak efficiency at 23.04%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Wuxi Sunket New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. specializes in the design, production, and sales of solar cells, photovoltaic modules, lithium batteries, and solar systems. The company is committed to becoming a diversified, large-scale, international professional solar green energy supplier, providing one-stop services...
- Founded
- 2007
- Headquarters
- Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China
- Annual capacity
- 3 GW/year
- Employees
- 201-500
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Sunket New Energy skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (53%)
The flagships
Written summary
Sunket New Energy and AKCOME are both Chinese solar manufacturers, founded in 2007 and 2003 respectively, with headquarters in China. Sunket reports a production capacity of 3 GW and employs between 201 and 500 people, positioning it as a mid-tier industrial manufacturer. AKCOME has pursued a more aggressive capacity build-out, with plans for over 8 GW of HJT-dedicated production, though its institutional standing is more complicated - AKCOME appeared on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list briefly in late 2023 but has not been confirmed as Tier 1 bankable since, and the dataset explicitly flags it as non-bankable at this time. Neither manufacturer carries the same financial credibility as the top-ten global names, but Sunket's larger and more diversified product catalog gives it a marginally broader industrial footprint for buyers seeking multi-segment coverage.
The two lineups differ substantially in character. Sunket offers 55 catalogued panels spanning a wide power range, with an average output of 465 Wp and a top rating of 700 Wp, and an average efficiency of 21.1% reaching up to 23.0% on its best TOPCon models. About 53% of its portfolio uses TOPCon cell technology, and 78% of panels are bifacial - a lineup well suited to commercial and light utility projects that need flexible sourcing. AKCOME's catalogued panels, just three models, are all bifacial HJT and average a high 672 Wp, topping out at 700 Wp with a maximum efficiency of 22.5%. Where AKCOME clearly leads is thermal performance: its average temperature coefficient of -0.24%/°C compares favorably to Sunket's -0.30%/°C, meaning AKCOME modules lose less output on hot days. AKCOME also offers a flat 30-year product warranty versus Sunket's average of roughly 29 years.
For a typical utility or commercial buyer in 2025, Sunket is the more practical default - its 3 GW capacity, diverse TOPCon portfolio, and broader market presence make procurement and bankability conversations more straightforward. AKCOME's HJT technology is genuinely compelling, especially in high-irradiance or high-temperature sites, but its thin catalog and current non-Tier-1 status make it a specialist choice rather than a go-to option until its bankability credentials are restored.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.