AKCOME vs Fellow Energy - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Fellow Energy has the broader catalog (13 vs 3 models). Fellow Energy leads on peak efficiency at 22.90%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Fellow Energy is a solar energy technology manufacturer founded in 2020 in Gaziantep, Türkiye. The company specializes in the research, development, manufacturing, and sales of photovoltaic modules and solar cells, all of which are fully designed and produced domestically. Fellow Energy is recognized as a Tier 1 solar...
- Founded
- 2020
- Headquarters
- Gaziantep, Türkiye
- Employees
- 350+
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (54%)
The flagships
Written summary
AKCOME is a Chinese solar manufacturer operating out of Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu Province, with roots going back to 2003 and a subsidiary, AKCOME Technology, listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange since 2011. The company built substantial production infrastructure, reaching a reported 3.2 GW of HJT cell capacity and over 10 GW of module capacity across four factories, though in 2024 one of its operating entities filed for bankruptcy, reflecting the severe margin pressure across China's solar sector. Critically, AKCOME does not hold Tier 1 bankable status, which raises lender caution on project financing. Fellow Energy, by contrast, was founded in 2020 in Gaziantep, Turkiye, and despite its youth has achieved Tier 1 bankability recognition and built a fully integrated domestic supply chain across three factories totaling approximately 2.1 GW of annual capacity, with a workforce of over 350. For a buyer prioritising lender acceptance on financed projects, Fellow Energy carries the stronger institutional footprint today.
On product portfolio, the comparison is asymmetric because Fellow Energy's panel catalog was not available in this dataset, while AKCOME's three-model lineup is well-documented. AKCOME's panels are entirely HJT-based and 100 percent bifacial, averaging 671 Wp and peaking at 700 Wp with an average module efficiency of 21.6 percent and a top efficiency of 22.54 percent. The average temperature coefficient of -0.24 percent per degree Celsius is among the best in the industry, a hallmark of HJT architecture that delivers measurable yield advantages in warm climates. AKCOME backs its modules with a 30-year warranty. This profile suits utility-scale and large commercial ground-mount installations where bifacial gain and low thermal degradation justify the premium. Fellow Energy's technical specifications could not be compared directly given the absence of panel data, which itself limits its transparent evaluability.
For a typical buyer in 2025, Fellow Energy is the more defensible choice on bankability and supply-chain resilience, especially for European or MENA project finance contexts where Turkish-origin modules also carry trade-policy advantages. AKCOME's HJT modules are technically impressive - the 700 Wp ceiling and low temperature coefficient are genuine differentiators - but the company's unresolved financial difficulties and non-Tier-1 status add procurement risk that most developers will find hard to accept on institutional projects.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-11
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.