AKCOME vs Bruk-Bet - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Bruk-Bet has the broader catalog (20 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Bruk-Bet Fotowoltaika is a leading Polish manufacturer of photovoltaic (PV) and BIPV modules, and part of the larger Bruk-Bet Group. The company has been operating in the construction industry since 1984 and has been active in renewable energy since 2011. Bruk-Bet is known for its high-quality building solutions and...
- Founded
- 1984
- Headquarters
- Nieciecza, Poland
- Employees
- 1000+
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (75%)
The flagships
Written summary
AKCOME is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Zhejiang province that built itself into a multi-gigawatt-scale supplier over roughly two decades, producing both solar cells and modules. It previously held Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankability status and reported module capacity of around 3.8 GW as of the early 2020s. However, AKCOME's institutional standing has collapsed sharply: the company recorded net losses every year from 2019 onward, halted production across several subsidiaries in mid-2024, and was delisted from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2024 after its share price fell below the minimum threshold for 20 consecutive trading days. A subsidiary was subsequently placed into court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization. Bruk-Bet is a Polish manufacturer based in Tarnow and part of the broader BRUK-BET construction group, which has operated for over 38 years. Its solar division is a small-scale regional player with annual module production capacity of around 120 MW - three orders of magnitude smaller than AKCOME at its peak - and does not appear on published Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 lists. On institutional footprint, AKCOME had the stronger global presence historically, though that standing is now severely compromised.
On the product side, AKCOME's portfolio was built around n-type technologies, offering TOPCon modules under the AK iTopper line and HJT modules under the AK iPower line aimed at utility and high-performance commercial segments. Bruk-Bet focuses on PERC half-cut monocrystalline modules in the BEM series, covering outputs suited to residential rooftops and small commercial systems in the Polish and broader Central European market. Bruk-Bet also produces full-black aesthetic variants for design-conscious residential buyers.
For a typical buyer in 2025, neither brand offers a straightforward recommendation in its current state. AKCOME's warranty continuity is genuinely uncertain given the ongoing insolvency proceedings, making it a poor choice regardless of technology quality. Bruk-Bet is a stable but limited regional option - suitable for buyers in Poland who prioritize local supply chain and European manufacturing, but not positioned as a globally competitive tier-one choice.
- AKCOME confirms delisting from the Shenzhen stock market - pv magazine
- Akcome halts some manufacturing, faces possible Chinese stock delisting
- Akcome Technology on HJT cell production and copper plating processes
- Polish module maker Bruk-Bet Solar raises annual capacity to 120 MW
- Akcome Solar Panels - Independent Review
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-24
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.