Skip to main content

AIKO vs Neo Solar Power - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AIKO
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the AIKO review
VS
Neo Solar Power
Taiwan Founded 2005
Read the Neo Solar Power review
At a glance

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 30 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Neo Solar Power leans bifacial (67% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
144 30
Highest power
805 Wp 715 Wp
Best efficiency
25.2% 23.0%
Average efficiency
23.7% 21.8%
Bifacial share
24% 67%
Average warranty
30 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
AIKO
Founded
2009
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Neo Solar Power
Founded
2005
Headquarters
Hsinchu, Taiwan
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric AIKO Neo Solar Power
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 144+114 30
Max Power 805 W+90 W 715 W
Avg Power 581 W+46 W 535 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 25.20%+2.17 pp 23.03%
Avg Efficiency 23.65%+1.86 pp 21.79%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.271%/°C+0.049 -0.320%/°C
Bifacial Share 35 (24%) 20 (67%)+42 pp
Avg Warranty 29.5 yrs+2.0 yr 27.5 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)

AIKO cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)

Neo Solar Power cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (67%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

AIKO is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Guangzhou, founded in 2009, that has expanded rapidly into a globally recognized module brand. The company achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status beginning in Q3 2024 and reached approximately 20 GW of annual production capacity in early 2025, with continued capacity additions bringing it to a reported 35.5 GW by mid-2026. Neo Solar Power (NSP) is a Taiwanese cell and module producer founded in 2005 that was once the largest solar cell manufacturer in Taiwan by revenue. In 2018, NSP merged with Gintech, Solartech, and NDF to form United Renewable Energy Co. (UREC), under which the NSP and Delsolar brands continue to operate. UREC does not appear in recent BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists based on available sources, and its global module footprint is considerably more limited than AIKO's. On institutional scale and bankability, AIKO holds the stronger position today.

AIKO's portfolio is built around its proprietary N-type ABC (All Back Contact) cell architecture, which the company differentiates from both mainstream TOPCon and HJT approaches. The residential Neostar series targets premium rooftop installations with compact formats and high efficiency, the Comet series addresses commercial and industrial rooftop projects at higher wattages, and the INFINITE platform is aimed at the most demanding high-performance applications. NSP/UREC's current range spans multicrystalline cells, monocrystalline cells, bifacial cells, and modules under the NSP and Delsolar brands. After the 2018 merger, UREC also pivoted into energy storage and hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles, making solar modules a smaller share of its overall business compared to its standalone years.

For most buyers in 2025 - particularly in residential and premium commercial segments - AIKO is the clearer default, backed by verified Tier 1 bankability, growing global distribution, and a well-documented high-efficiency roadmap. NSP/UREC may suit buyers seeking cells or regionally available legacy modules, but its lower profile in international review channels and its broad corporate pivot make it harder to recommend as a general-purpose choice. The two brands are not interchangeable: AIKO targets performance-focused buyers, while NSP/UREC occupies a more legacy and diversified supplier role.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-22

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
AIKO A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Neo Solar Power
Manufacturers
AIKO AEET
Manufacturers
AKCOME Neo Solar Power
Manufacturers
AIKO ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM Neo Solar Power
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 179 AIKO offers · See 3 Neo Solar Power offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.