AIKO vs Mysolar USA - solar panel manufacturer comparison
AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 15 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Mysolar USA leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
- Founded
- 2009
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Listed
- SZSE: 600732
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Mysolar is a sub-brand of Mamibot, specializing in designing and manufacturing high-efficiency solar panels using state-of-the-art technology. The company aims to become a Tier 1 solar panel manufacturer, offering a wide range of modules for residential and commercial projects. Mysolar is committed to rewriting the...
- Founded
- 2010
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Annual capacity
- 3.2 GW/year
- Employees
- 60
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+
Mysolar USA offers more 600W+ panels (67% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (67%)
The flagships
Written summary
Mysolar USA is a solar panel brand operated under Mamibot USA, a company with US incorporation and manufacturing roots in China. It cites more than 17 years of solar PV engineering experience, though independent confirmation of this lineage is limited. As of early 2026, Mysolar USA has not achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status, and company materials indicate that mass production for larger orders was only beginning to ramp toward the 25 MW range in early 2026 - a very modest scale by industry standards. AIKO Solar, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer that secured BloombergNEF Tier 1 recognition in Q3 2024, placing it among the roughly 2% of global solar companies to earn that designation. AIKO reports annual production capacity exceeding 5 GW and over 190 GW in cumulative cell and module shipments. On institutional footprint, AIKO holds a decisive advantage.
Mysolar USA offers a broad catalog spanning PERC, shingled PERC, TOPCon, and HJT modules ranging from roughly 410 W to 740 W, targeting residential rooftops and smaller commercial installations. AIKO has built its reputation around N-type All-Back-Contact (ABC) cell technology, which places all contacts on the rear of the cell to maximize the light-absorbing surface. Its Neostar series has set efficiency benchmarks, with the company claiming a world-record 24.4% module efficiency for commercially available panels as of 2025. AIKO also offers a 30-year performance warranty with a low 0.35% annual degradation rate from year two onward - more generous terms than most peers.
For a typical buyer in 2025, AIKO is the more defensible choice. Its Tier 1 bankability, GW-scale manufacturing, and leading ABC efficiency make it suitable for residential, commercial, and financed projects alike. Mysolar USA may appeal to buyers seeking a smaller, more flexible vendor or a competitive entry point into HJT technology, but its limited institutional track record and modest production scale introduce meaningful supply and warranty-support risk that AIKO does not share.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-15
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 179 AIKO offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.