AIKO vs Mogen Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 5 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Mogen Solar leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
- Founded
- 2009
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Listed
- SZSE: 600732
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+
AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (100%)
The flagships
Written summary
Mogen Solar and AIKO Solar occupy very different rungs of the global photovoltaic industry. AIKO, founded in 2009 and headquartered in China, is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange and has accumulated approximately 190 GW in cumulative cell and module shipments, with active capacity expansions targeting 30 GW or more across multiple facilities. Crucially, AIKO holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankable status, meaning its modules qualify for non-recourse project financing with major commercial banks - a prerequisite for utility-scale and institutional procurement. Mogen Solar, by contrast, carries no Tier 1 designation and maintains a minimal public profile; it is best treated as a smaller, regionally focused supplier whose institutional footprint is difficult to verify independently.
The two portfolios diverge sharply on specification ambition. Mogen's entire lineup of five panels uses TOPCon cell technology, is 100% bifacial, and tops out at 435 Wp with a maximum module efficiency of 22% and an average of 21.52% - solid mid-tier numbers that suit residential rooftops and small commercial installations where space is available and cost sensitivity is moderate. The temperature coefficient of -0.30% per degree Celsius is typical for TOPCon but not class-leading. AIKO's catalog of 144 models is built predominantly on its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) architecture, pushing average efficiency to 23.65% and peak efficiency to 25.2%, with peak power reaching 805 Wp and an average of 581 Wp - numbers aimed squarely at premium residential, commercial-and-industrial, and high-density rooftop applications where every square meter counts. Only about 24% of AIKO's portfolio is bifacial, reflecting a deliberate focus on high-density rooftop formats rather than ground-mount trackers. An average warranty of approximately 29.5 years further underlines the confidence AIKO projects to end buyers.
For a typical buyer in 2025, AIKO is the more defensible default: higher efficiency, a far broader product range, Tier 1 bankability for project-finance purposes, and a long warranty backstop. Mogen's all-TOPCon bifacial lineup remains viable for buyers seeking a straightforward bifacial panel at potentially lower initial cost, but the absence of Tier 1 status introduces real financing risk and makes it unsuitable for any project requiring institutional lender approval.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 174 AIKO offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.