AIKO vs CW Enerji - solar panel manufacturer comparison
AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 15 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
- Founded
- 2009
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Listed
- SZSE: 600732
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
CW Enerji is a Turkish solar panel manufacturer and energy solutions provider established in 2010, headquartered in Antalya. The company produces monocrystalline and TopCon N-Type solar panels with an annual capacity of 1.8 GW, and also offers energy storage, EV charging, and heat pump solutions. It is publicly traded...
- Founded
- 2010
- Headquarters
- Antalya, Turkey
- Annual capacity
- 1-2 GW/year
- Employees
- 1000-2000
- Listed
- BIST: CWENE
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+
AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (100%)
The flagships
Written summary
AIKO is a Chinese manufacturer, founded in Guangzhou, that has built a reputation around its proprietary N-type ABC (All Back Contact) silicon technology. The company achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status as of Q3 2024 and reports a production capacity of approximately 20 GW as of early 2025, with ABC module shipments scaling rapidly from around 6 GW in 2024 to nearly 15 GW in 2025. CW Enerji, by contrast, is a Turkish manufacturer established in 2010 and headquartered in Antalya, operating at a more regional scale with reported module capacity of 1.8 GW and a 1.2 GW TOPCon cell facility that is described as the largest of its kind in Turkey and Europe. The company is investing $520 million to reach 5 GW of capacity by 2028 and exports to roughly 60 countries, though it does not appear on publicly confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists. On institutional footprint and global financing track record, AIKO currently holds the stronger position.
AIKO's product range centers on its Neostar line for residential rooftops, where efficiency ratings have reached 25% at the module level, and its Comet line for commercial and industrial ground-mount or large-rooftop installations at up to 630 W. Its INFINITE platform, rolled out at scale in 2025, pushes toward 680 W. These products target buyers who prioritize absolute peak efficiency and are willing to pay a corresponding premium. CW Enerji's catalog spans a much wider wattage range - from small specialty panels up to 675 W - using TOPCon cell technology, with module efficiencies in the 20-23% range. Its competitive angle is geographic: Turkish-origin panels currently enter the United States tariff-free, making CW Enerji an attractive option for cost-sensitive North American commercial or utility-scale buyers who need a non-Chinese supply chain.
For a buyer focused on maximum efficiency in a space-constrained residential installation, AIKO is the clearer choice in 2025 given its confirmed bankability, technology leadership, and global installer ecosystem. CW Enerji suits buyers where supply-chain diversification, tariff exposure, or regional European and North American procurement rules are the primary driver, and where mainstream TOPCon efficiency is sufficient. The two brands are not interchangeable - they occupy meaningfully different market niches.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-08
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 174 AIKO offers · See 4 CW Enerji offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.